From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id sOLvBJGBIGDgVQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 00:10:57 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id KA3UAJGBIGA/CwAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 00:10:57 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82C309404C8 for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 00:10:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:51634 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8u8j-0008Jc-UH for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 19:10:53 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36664) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8u8a-0008JS-F5 for help-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 19:10:44 -0500 Received: from mail.zaclys.net ([178.33.93.72]:55985) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8u8V-0008Vr-VO for help-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 19:10:44 -0500 Received: from [192.168.0.27] (82-64-145-38.subs.proxad.net [82.64.145.38]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.zaclys.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 1180AX7J058975 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 8 Feb 2021 01:10:33 +0100 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.zaclys.net 1180AX7J058975 Authentication-Results: mail.zaclys.net; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=lle-bout@zaclys.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zaclys.net; s=default; t=1612743033; bh=RknyYRzF2+lk0HqaAbt/C6gxb8NYGy8tIvLQVQ8vwLo=; h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=VPsPEEfx9wuHqqe271RTqM/eup943FMvV/yKCeQbngToWCFPHfJmmgI7LayBpZo5q rqP4IVeryedKcETnrijZ1qDoEX1OPu+JVbC784eON3Tw3yVYYG7NOpgUKVrdmHeHWP upv2OfD0vcOFMM/o0slEh312hAnYemBjw8XPdeTo= Message-ID: <430f82da10dfba13110b6efcb71c06b9b4dcb7b9.camel@zaclys.net> Subject: Re: flatpak applications in the gnome applications menu (XDG_DATA_DIRS) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?L=E9o?= Le Bouter To: Adonay Felipe Nogueira , help-guix@gnu.org Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2021 01:10:27 +0100 In-Reply-To: <49c69dd2-54d7-5f2a-26e5-7b401f9726a2@hyperbola.info> References: <49c69dd2-54d7-5f2a-26e5-7b401f9726a2@hyperbola.info> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-tfTXrJp1I4zJWIs5QYZs" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=178.33.93.72; envelope-from=lle-bout@zaclys.net; helo=mail.zaclys.net X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-guix@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.16 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=zaclys.net header.s=default header.b=VPsPEEfx; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=zaclys.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of help-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=help-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 82C309404C8 X-Spam-Score: -5.16 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: UH7SZiwxEEth --=-tfTXrJp1I4zJWIs5QYZs Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2021-02-07 at 20:53 -0300, Adonay Felipe Nogueira via wrote: > Em 07/02/2021 15:59, Christophe Pisteur escreveu: > > I installed Element (1) by flatpak, but applications installed by >=20 > First question is: why is Flatpak being distributed by Guix without > any patch to conform to GNU FSDG? The version distributed by GNU Guix does conform to the GNU FSDG. Additional remotes that may contain any kind of software free or nonfree have to be manually added by the user, their freedom, after all. I hope to get to a point where we have a fork of Electron similarly to Ungoogled-chromium. This way applications based on it are less problematic to build. --=-tfTXrJp1I4zJWIs5QYZs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEFIvLi9gL+xax3g6RRaix6GvNEKYFAmAggXQACgkQRaix6GvN EKZGQg//YESAHS+GN95SxuGGBdGe8TS3TDoV6TAaO6ibRldv8P2YvNfzkj+LBAF5 P+E/xmwi67FqCyC22MBQpYz+PlIlANwfBKG8eOyt1SPxtaQ5xgwTmIBy1Nvn3x3B lbB8Uz04CI/ZCAl/x2LsrJf54Zy4mkTyN75EC9+iUzLav6G7ahnYNCHEPJNLQh2z OkKnM+S7bV+hAMUy62ChqQKY6g72N5q2J8pdCMGvYe56TBF1ElYxpamzVObwWVec Vpv7U4KAlP7qNYG3auIPqTF+LaiMw3o5aWmls9a9cIG8w9MwXD14aZhOB5f9zVES 67+RZzwU8e3a2WaEX6LMSESrbNHuzJkW5FRtcEzSggLClnPlnqXm9j0yKEkx9AdD l5CN9Uw7s1A/n851omSdFRBCw1AHri1MYci5oGc/mA+7PT9nZb8g5Z610IwJj2AE kw5apX+XMayyFp7lT9mvygB3V9WmdU+QeN/7tJr7XnAoW6XoWXXH3Mt8J0gPFvoW SAXTkDET8AgjpWmiqNAxYT3dmhB+Guwwt13TQVVQ5SYX6LcfYo+P9PiUV3e8F6Aq bQlQDVQvtYrSxzh1t2Ho3/y1b6+QWlqYeCpNgQfm/iYjmMnjMpIQJJF4Q52nsGYv H/iFBTwqAu+q4Mh3DGDf50CHsKBvkNFtKHF4PzljSvRhkyFtgo8= =lZHV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-tfTXrJp1I4zJWIs5QYZs--