From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: znavko@disroot.org
Subject: how to understand this SELinux stuff?
Date: Sat, 04 May 2019 16:42:52 +0000
Message-ID: <29974c7468844bd9eeed7dfa362b4bc4@disroot.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50235)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <znavko@disroot.org>) id 1hMxlg-0000t2-9w
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2019 12:44:11 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <znavko@disroot.org>) id 1hMxld-0000yq-C3
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2019 12:44:08 -0400
Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]:44360)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <znavko@disroot.org>) id 1hMxlc-0000YK-L6
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2019 12:44:05 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CB0C3077F
	for <help-guix@gnu.org>; Sat,  4 May 2019 18:42:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 3JpU7lTzrYEZ for <help-guix@gnu.org>;
	Sat,  4 May 2019 18:42:52 +0200 (CEST)
List-Id: <help-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:help-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Help-Guix" <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: help-guix <help-guix@gnu.org>

Hello! I am translating SELinux info messages. There are some hard formul=
ations, but this is the best:=0A=0A#. type: enumerate=0A#: doc/guix.texi:=
1291=0Amsgid "We could generate a much more restrictive policy at install=
ation time, so that only the @emph{exact} file name of the currently inst=
alled @code{guix-daemon} executable would be labelled with @code{guix_dae=
mon_exec_t}, instead of using a broad regular expression. The downside is=
 that root would have to install or upgrade the policy at installation ti=
me whenever the Guix package that provides the effectively running @code{=
guix-daemon} executable is upgraded."=0A=0AI cannot understand the latter=
 sentence. What is the 'guix package that provides the effectively runnin=
g guix-damon'? Can I say just: if guix-daemon's executable was upgraded?