From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id qEjEImAoE2AhWAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 21:10:56 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id MJuTHmAoE2CAVgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 21:10:56 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46FBC940481 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 21:10:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:39714 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l5EZ5-0000xD-2Y for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 16:10:55 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41096) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l5EYY-0000ro-1u; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 16:10:27 -0500 Received: from a.siauliai.hyperbola.info ([2a02:e00:ffe7:6::1]:53972 helo=smtp.hyperbola.info) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l5EYU-0003pX-5u; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 16:10:21 -0500 Received: by smtp.hyperbola.info (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id fe9f968c (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) auth=yes user=adfeno; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 21:10:12 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: packaging a golang package To: help-guix@gnu.org References: <87h7nrud2a.fsf@timmydouglas.com> <4bdbc469-ad45-4739-b001-739ad3a60adc@www.fastmail.com> <87a6thtyvm.fsf@timmydouglas.com> <87bldw0ztb.fsf@timmydouglas.com> <20210125204534.ovhvt7rzj7tbqrnt@fjo-extia-HPdeb.example.avalenn.eu> <87wnvymoxe.fsf@gmail.com> <87mtwtkq0l.fsf@gnu.org> Message-ID: <203dfc3a-af6a-7ca8-6d3f-28ea609c779f@hyperbola.info> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 18:10:00 -0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87mtwtkq0l.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MfOqwNEXsyt8RX3IlbZqLX64jkg66jH5i" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:e00:ffe7:6::1; envelope-from=adfeno@hyperbola.info; helo=smtp.hyperbola.info X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_FAIL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-guix@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, 44178@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" Reply-to: Adonay Felipe Nogueira From: adfeno--- via X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.95 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of help-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=help-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 46FBC940481 X-Spam-Score: -4.95 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: ttLlcqMzjl8m This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --MfOqwNEXsyt8RX3IlbZqLX64jkg66jH5i Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="23VhrFqLsnHEFffv8U69poONqGMwYMvbk" --23VhrFqLsnHEFffv8U69poONqGMwYMvbk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: pt-BR Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Em 28/01/2021 13:03, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s escreveu: > IMO, =E2=80=98guix import=E2=80=99 does not =E2=80=9Csteer users toward= s obtaining any nonfree > information=E2=80=9D any more than wget does. It=E2=80=99s a tool for = packagers that > returns a package definition or template thereof, and it=E2=80=99s up t= o the > packager to decide what to do with it. I do agree with you, sorry if for some reason it sounded otherwise. My in= tention is not to censor the user on that matter. Let me make it clear wh= at I meant in the previous message: =46rom the bug report I referenced, one can see that what I find strange = is that the cargo provided by Guix (installable through `guix package -i = rust:cargo') has cargo's default repository enabled. The bug report refer= enced has some ideas to try to solve this (although I didn't make extensi= ve test to see if they are all possible and doable). --=20 * Ativista do software livre * https://libreplanet.org/wiki/User:Adfeno * Membro dos grupos avaliadores de * Software (Free Software Directory) * Distribui=C3=A7=C3=B5es de sistemas (FreedSoftware) * Sites (Free JavaScript Action Team) * N=C3=A3o sou advogado e n=C3=A3o fomento os n=C3=A3o livres * Sempre veja o spam/lixo eletr=C3=B4nico do teu e-mail * Ou coloque todos os recebidos na caixa de entrada * Sempre assino e-mails com OpenPGP * Chave p=C3=BAblica: vide endere=C3=A7o anterior * Qualquer outro pode ser fraude * Se n=C3=A3o tens OpenPGP, ignore o anexo "signature.asc" * Ao enviar anexos * Docs., planilhas e apresenta=C3=A7=C3=B5es: use OpenDocument * Outros tipos: vide endere=C3=A7o anterior * Use protocolos de comunica=C3=A7=C3=A3o federadas * Vide endere=C3=A7o anterior * Mensagens secretas somente via * XMPP com OMEMO * E-mail criptografado e assinado com OpenPGP --23VhrFqLsnHEFffv8U69poONqGMwYMvbk-- --MfOqwNEXsyt8RX3IlbZqLX64jkg66jH5i Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEAREIAB0WIQRlfzovINS9uQH7pZ3I1uFSAe6doQUCYBMoKAAKCRDI1uFSAe6d oZKRAQDutCckSeUCbaxAIi4569bElMce2l3xBGClWSbLuVx73QD+OwBz6e5uGW5a siUBI92+h8pwD2xyK/s2UgYVlmCpJt0= =tSmf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MfOqwNEXsyt8RX3IlbZqLX64jkg66jH5i--