From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id kFnACovZk184WwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 07:36:43 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id YOeYBovZk1+sPwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 07:36:43 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F129E9401CD for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 07:36:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:55372 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kWE6S-0007NB-DS for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 03:36:40 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53826) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kWE5g-0007LF-Jy for help-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 03:35:52 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:41799) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kWE5e-0008Gl-Gm for help-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 03:35:52 -0400 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49EDC5C00DE; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 03:35:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 24 Oct 2020 03:35:48 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pantherx.org; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=fm1; bh= vkY+diGwllUhCEOdMDgvPalwqrEJYajhLihxrOILwxI=; b=Ffzg4Jv1Gplr/CeA Oew6YWeL0K9qlbWu21STNNCrX9urMujYpzOWDhcgDF7kS85kDkIYAQkuQKYhGwee nh4uQpuUCHiQZnkhTZLtoxOHCwOIEhdBE3SsWd1gY3mbrzapeKnmi5pMdigaEcAV GaDamkvC+LDu/L+YgNcMcOVLIToX0ViRfYil0dpGcU06ZZlOKfa+g+1HsCMAg23J ohDz4yWi+fDL4PujRbNeM9vKZI/Rf12l7VkyCrB8BRUakG7YlcdOdFfqFXm9JPPI Q6rDgTvZX5Umt9C50pEdLSshAk6FM12RuoCS8H8VqnMmHJcO+vvdV+R0juH5l2MQ kwAkbg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=vkY+diGwllUhCEOdMDgvPalwqrEJYajhLihxrOILw xI=; b=cUbN7OcRcG3wxBH9eX+eveu93cAgLAvprtVCDRFCTSKJC+mMIQh9CUQbQ UeqcBmjDvAc38vMnadh9COnDnn8MJnvH70iOANKqFL2yfQfHBpMGPLFDaR8L7h6S J9M5+1GFZkkvIWfx+DqJX5eWKRFZkpfzZzbMIOLSGcEYcsgRq9lrhDRa/AaGuzG1 P/CDFN/YarMiTaivGKdDKnbGkRjeuiCsy4JjMjybTXwR1Y+CoR8CfslrZdWw+uef rhrTcnNw+xaiJ2C9nwIkrnZrFKtGgLG/KkGsnLdG0NPVxeRVVhOLj0JJ16xJvsdj Tm6Fsfh6sgVk+wwxbsKGjlH4tXceA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrkedugdduvdefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkjghfohfogggtgfesth hqredtredtjeenucfhrhhomheptfgviigrucetlhhiiigruggvhhcuofgrjhguuceorhdr mhgrjhgusehprghnthhhvghrgidrohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepgfegvdektd dthfeileffuedtieehgfdvteevgeevjeeijeevheelheffgefgtdejnecuffhomhgrihhn pehprghnthhhvghrgidrohhrghenucfkphepudekhedrvddtledrudeliedrudehkeenuc evlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehrrdhmrghj ugesphgrnhhthhgvrhigrdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (unknown [185.209.196.158]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id F1388328005E; Sat, 24 Oct 2020 03:35:46 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 11:05:41 +0330 From: Reza Alizadeh Majd To: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: guix environment ad-hoc manifests Message-ID: <20201024110541.2a481783@pantherx.org> In-Reply-To: <87tuumthoa.fsf@elephly.net> References: <20201022123929.6ca21e85@pantherx.org> <875z72v5nd.fsf@elephly.net> <20201022163832.3618d9d9@pantherx.org> <87tuumthoa.fsf@elephly.net> Organization: PantherX X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.7 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.26; envelope-from=r.majd@pantherx.org; helo=out2-smtp.messagingengine.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/24 03:35:48 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-guix@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: help-guix@gnu.org Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=pantherx.org header.s=fm1 header.b=Ffzg4Jv1; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b=cUbN7OcR; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of help-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=help-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.21 X-TUID: Y5DXEnPu0IjE On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 17:16:21 +0200 Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > > yes, a possible use-case would be to provide a development > > environment for a software which is not packaged yet. during > > development phase, we could easily update this manifest file and > > include third-parties we need to use. =20 >=20 > But isn=E2=80=99t this exactly what you can use a manifest file for alrea= dy? > =E2=80=9Cguix environment=E2=80=9D not only accepts a file that describes= a package, > but also a manifest. >=20 Thank you for your response, there is just a point that I don't understand. - when we add a package to environment, all of package inputs will be added to the environment. - using --ad-hoc switch, package itself will be present in environment. now I want to know add a series of packages using --manifest, add them directly to the environment (like --ad-hoc), or add inputs for each package to environment? =20 Thanks Reza --=20 Reza Alizadeh Majd PantherX Team https://www.pantherx.org/