From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id mFmiNH1W0V5kDQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 29 May 2020 18:37:49 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id yJFcMH1W0V6gSgAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 29 May 2020 18:37:49 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BEC4940CBC for ; Fri, 29 May 2020 18:37:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:44738 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jejt4-0008Lr-O2 for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 29 May 2020 14:37:46 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54522) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jejsv-0008Jl-5i for help-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 29 May 2020 14:37:38 -0400 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:60901) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jejsu-0000FR-A7; Fri, 29 May 2020 14:37:36 -0400 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 173DD5C008B; Fri, 29 May 2020 14:37:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 29 May 2020 14:37:34 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; s=mesmtp; bh=ZgiMakcmeMINaarZlQnt20loQ2nXEIblpfD0GAXF+p8=; b=GQ2Cu4nbzP/L NhiXAb4PE1ct7qR+kTTRe/SBVEnW+WSTOFrt9gmr4Fw1SelSe8uv840gOf6VxBqZ 7GCXotRumvLa5SqVNZfIXoIzk01kYl8kftBGBIuVnUEL3GHQhnKUarazkaTHwdAW YZr/zaHj/eUBsnpFCnp+0XMhuZA9mAk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=ZgiMakcmeMINaarZlQnt20loQ2nXEIblpfD0GAXF+ p8=; b=lk/3X8+NTfbKWlqggFJItxdceCCUWqIjMKRF0SY/3T1+rJQKKvimJ/trG I7k+223rW8LIraFXBxs7lSnf8x2R1EITdfrwkU5zrZTDJrXmoSVoYcL/sXy0GQBA lZ/rDZ1NzmenRMWvk/gdaKR+gTLVaIHfRuKxUr2wKRlxmUqXJXIG8cuJgxApJBs3 FRzED5+MaC2m2FJRlzqdrPdjVH0Q9OUZeqfCTi3ipkeRCZFI3uAmEyLf9APbxKMQ GGmUFN3PJFMM8QyGrcMv7bq4dfk038uj5tBsSgW/tn3kv61eXOdbgxWUo7QzfZzz JNGidwgxqI7SFiBhEfkZITMzzWrxA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedruddvkedguddtvdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggugfgjsehtqhertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefnvgho ucfhrghmuhhlrghrihcuoehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgvqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpedtleekjeevgefgveeuudefteffvdffhedtieetjeffhefgieefjeeiteek ieehveenucfkphepjeeirdduvdegrddufeekrdeifeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpe dtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehlvghosehfrghmuhhlrghrihdrnhgrmhgv X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (c-76-124-138-63.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [76.124.138.63]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 606EA3280064; Fri, 29 May 2020 14:37:33 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 14:37:31 -0400 From: Leo Famulari To: Marius Bakke Subject: Re: Guix Docker image inflation Message-ID: <20200529183731.GA6374@jasmine.lan> References: <20200528181043.GC23745@jasmine.lan> <20200529170820.GA30828@jasmine.lan> <20200529180245.GA3754@jasmine.lan> <87d06m4n6z.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <87d06m4n6z.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.29; envelope-from=leo@famulari.name; helo=out5-smtp.messagingengine.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/29 14:02:48 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-guix@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: help-guix , Stephen Scheck Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=famulari.name header.s=mesmtp header.b=GQ2Cu4nb; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=lk/3X8+N; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of help-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=help-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.01 X-TUID: LtrVJnPnFjtN On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 08:21:08PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote: > Leo Famulari writes: > > --branch and --commit would be passed to `guix pull`, and then you'd run > > `guix system docker-image` based on that. >=20 > There is also 'guix time-machine --commit=3Dabc123 -- system docker-image= '. Right, that's probably more efficient than creating lots of `guix pull` generations.