From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Efraim Flashner Subject: Re: Repeated build failure of GDK-Pixbuf 2.38.1 Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 10:06:43 +0200 Message-ID: <20200128080643.GY1603@E5400> References: <20200128050210.73aaead7@jrhaighs-debian-x200> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gpOboRovIPmaBszt" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44512) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iwLu1-0003ew-At for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 03:07:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iwLu0-0003DX-16 for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 03:07:17 -0500 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:58770) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iwLtz-0003DI-R8 for help-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 03:07:15 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200128050210.73aaead7@jrhaighs-debian-x200> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" To: "J. R. Haigh (re. Guix)" Cc: help-guix@gnu.org --gpOboRovIPmaBszt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 05:02:10AM +0000, J. R. Haigh (re. Guix) wrote: > Hi all, > I've been having the following build failure during =E2=80=98guix upgrad= e=E2=80=99: > [=E2=80=A6] > building /gnu/store/js4ix1yhhhk2j184bc19ynq3cap1f3a5-gdk-pixbuf-2.38.1.dr= v... > building /gnu/store/qjnfwlnhs8x4dn23wzsa0815fc4kknms-llvm-7.0.1.drv... > \builder for `/gnu/store/js4ix1yhhhk2j184bc19ynq3cap1f3a5-gdk-pixbuf-2.38= =2E1.drv' failed with exit code 1 > build of /gnu/store/js4ix1yhhhk2j184bc19ynq3cap1f3a5-gdk-pixbuf-2.38.1.dr= v failed > View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/js/4ix1yhhhk2j184bc19ynq3cap1f3a5-g= dk-pixbuf-2.38.1.drv.bz2'. > cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/crrrvbdh0bhg305l70fxyx04mwpz5ff7-gdk-= pixbuf+svg-2.38.1.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built > building /gnu/store/wyib6fc7l9y6rgs66mpj9x3dpblkx93z-wayland-protocols-1.= 17.tar.xz.drv... > building /gnu/store/5nfc4y0i7bgz65fdcsfwvrmn113gr3yl-xauth-1.0.10.tar.bz2= =2Edrv... > cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/8h7ps1kdf6glgf0wags3ywsxg9d266gv-gaji= m-1.1.3.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built > guix upgrade: error: build of `/gnu/store/8h7ps1kdf6glgf0wags3ywsxg9d266g= v-gajim-1.1.3.drv' failed > [=E2=80=A6] >=20 > I think that this has been the case for all but the most recent pull gene= ration that I haven't GC'd, as my only package generation is the one that r= emained after a GC that I did early December: > Generation 37 Dec 09 2019 01:44:33 (current) > glibc-utf8-locales 2.28 out /gnu/store/94k5w17z54w25lgp90czdqfv9m4hwzhq= -glibc-utf8-locales-2.28 > tiled 1.2.3 out /gnu/store/pijdpwzmk27xxi9ay6h0n5069m8x4lfx-tiled-1.2.3 > gajim 1.1.3 out /gnu/store/7ba6j1r1ns2fa71dnba4m3lvi3s2hll5-gajim-1.1.3 > nss-certs 3.43 out /gnu/store/6w65nzbc3ah30y5kr4zx9rcgknpjr1f5-nss-cert= s-3.43 > youtube-dl 2019.04.30 out /gnu/store/idg86l68r4qia0l0qs2r0w7vg7gf2189-y= outube-dl-2019.04.30 > darcs 2.14.2 out /gnu/store/f9zs0z6kmd4j60p8443ki2dgw07gwm7x-darcs-2.14= =2E2 > gajim-omemo 2.6.28 out /gnu/store/sz4fryksqlcihz8ln4j05dpm3jzf9jc5-gaji= m-omemo-2.6.28 >=20 > I'm pretty sure that no =E2=80=98guix upgrade=E2=80=99 since that GC has = succeeded, else I'd have more than 1 package generation. =E2=80=98guix pull= =E2=80=99 has been succeeding as I have several pull generations: >=20 > $ guix pull --list-generations 2>/dev/null | sed --regexp-extended --quie= t -- "s/^ (commit: .*)$/\1/p" > commit: bc587eb178799ccb9bd051f8f46569e1673a9991 > commit: e3388d6361dedabb2f6df9cdd5cc98e6cac7f457 > commit: 8c5cde2546b8bcca2285d5fa6545adeb5076b74e > commit: 762867313cb26bee32fafb6821a7ef7584c537c2 > commit: 704719edade1368f798c9301f3a8197a0df5c930 > commit: d63e0ee78d00ff1ccef9f74307b237b7e46ea15d > commit: 47ea2ad196a41a3c3de3e5fa970b6881495c0e8f > commit: fcb510c541e83291ea6682cba87020a913c64914 > commit: 7ee8acbb76bd440a8985a4b2a20b75521c6853ed >=20 > If I understand correctly then the GDK Pixbuf build regression was introd= uced between commits bc587eb178799ccb9bd051f8f46569e1673a9991 and e3388d636= 1dedabb2f6df9cdd5cc98e6cac7f457, sometime between Wednesday 11th December a= nd Wednesday 22nd January, which narrows down to 6 weeks where I didn't use= Guix. > I hope the detail helps you fix the regression. >=20 The current HEAD of Guix has gdk-pixbuf-2.40.0. What's the output of `which -a guix` and `guix describe`? It sounds like you're using an older version. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --gpOboRovIPmaBszt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAl4v65EACgkQQarn3Mo9 g1G6BxAAr/DTy7J5nECeKyXHijV+0Ul7EMTRsMd8+NadrGd7Wj+Wwo0w1yraNajm aSIN1UN8vGRtUel//c1UcnK9l/MWMRmFDfeHIvTiSbdeuIkZX2EYo4c37gdqTA6x dwVjnKmH8JdA+JAMjzWuNsRR/Mjky9s1FwD5J9Lyy3eBpUFbyPqzUZl2J/o+M+0p XNahSb8WZ2bXdc8H4RWxxQ4435LPuZNesJyLWAPePtakWwhHcYzgD0iPE533eyZ+ Kns0iDMkWhsIWcrs+L1FnDAmGDKuuKkG3O06VxlOM+iUvIR+7LQB4Ehu8oPhVV3q aMhgBvkCDuSIpIOVgUrBm4GHGBjWrf9jFu//5XOi8blRA6e2R5NPRt76cygG4zIW /7Vsejz2cTu1vvr3b6qXCRDgypVCqK7tkRxWfaIRvKo1d9Y2JoJrlcg4Ax3sSfc+ sFpSQNFEzd1fuPSsGiKtABkMyUsIS9taYSsWSulv8GKYHsS1fNSMahHHIByBnuT0 vfDWLz/3Gzsql+IqyM6j91OPd2sUTOSr82QWUPndrOSfLsJN8DzgbgbKaJAznVZ+ cJr+vNtP+fTbYpdvzl3dHCKv4nTnsa5xjW4oy0q8X9noq1lsE50Lmf010sKJE/BV wWGTD0Q5msyaJGK0badr2MBo2F/+V1CjfbDXLyKUecsYyrkhBJ4= =wqUY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gpOboRovIPmaBszt--