On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 05:02:10AM +0000, J. R. Haigh (re. Guix) wrote:
> Hi all,
> 	I've been having the following build failure during ‘guix upgrade’:
> […]
> building /gnu/store/js4ix1yhhhk2j184bc19ynq3cap1f3a5-gdk-pixbuf-2.38.1.drv...
> building /gnu/store/qjnfwlnhs8x4dn23wzsa0815fc4kknms-llvm-7.0.1.drv...
> \builder for `/gnu/store/js4ix1yhhhk2j184bc19ynq3cap1f3a5-gdk-pixbuf-2.38.1.drv' failed with exit code 1
> build of /gnu/store/js4ix1yhhhk2j184bc19ynq3cap1f3a5-gdk-pixbuf-2.38.1.drv failed
> View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/js/4ix1yhhhk2j184bc19ynq3cap1f3a5-gdk-pixbuf-2.38.1.drv.bz2'.
> cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/crrrvbdh0bhg305l70fxyx04mwpz5ff7-gdk-pixbuf+svg-2.38.1.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
> building /gnu/store/wyib6fc7l9y6rgs66mpj9x3dpblkx93z-wayland-protocols-1.17.tar.xz.drv...
> building /gnu/store/5nfc4y0i7bgz65fdcsfwvrmn113gr3yl-xauth-1.0.10.tar.bz2.drv...
> cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/8h7ps1kdf6glgf0wags3ywsxg9d266gv-gajim-1.1.3.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
> guix upgrade: error: build of `/gnu/store/8h7ps1kdf6glgf0wags3ywsxg9d266gv-gajim-1.1.3.drv' failed
> […]
> 
> I think that this has been the case for all but the most recent pull generation that I haven't GC'd, as my only package generation is the one that remained after a GC that I did early December:
> Generation 37	Dec 09 2019 01:44:33	(current)
>   glibc-utf8-locales	2.28	out	/gnu/store/94k5w17z54w25lgp90czdqfv9m4hwzhq-glibc-utf8-locales-2.28
>   tiled	1.2.3	out	/gnu/store/pijdpwzmk27xxi9ay6h0n5069m8x4lfx-tiled-1.2.3
>   gajim	1.1.3	out	/gnu/store/7ba6j1r1ns2fa71dnba4m3lvi3s2hll5-gajim-1.1.3
>   nss-certs	3.43	out	/gnu/store/6w65nzbc3ah30y5kr4zx9rcgknpjr1f5-nss-certs-3.43
>   youtube-dl	2019.04.30	out	/gnu/store/idg86l68r4qia0l0qs2r0w7vg7gf2189-youtube-dl-2019.04.30
>   darcs	2.14.2	out	/gnu/store/f9zs0z6kmd4j60p8443ki2dgw07gwm7x-darcs-2.14.2
>   gajim-omemo	2.6.28	out	/gnu/store/sz4fryksqlcihz8ln4j05dpm3jzf9jc5-gajim-omemo-2.6.28
> 
> I'm pretty sure that no ‘guix upgrade’ since that GC has succeeded, else I'd have more than 1 package generation. ‘guix pull’ has been succeeding as I have several pull generations:
> 
> $ guix pull --list-generations 2>/dev/null | sed --regexp-extended --quiet -- "s/^    (commit: .*)$/\1/p"
> commit: bc587eb178799ccb9bd051f8f46569e1673a9991
> commit: e3388d6361dedabb2f6df9cdd5cc98e6cac7f457
> commit: 8c5cde2546b8bcca2285d5fa6545adeb5076b74e
> commit: 762867313cb26bee32fafb6821a7ef7584c537c2
> commit: 704719edade1368f798c9301f3a8197a0df5c930
> commit: d63e0ee78d00ff1ccef9f74307b237b7e46ea15d
> commit: 47ea2ad196a41a3c3de3e5fa970b6881495c0e8f
> commit: fcb510c541e83291ea6682cba87020a913c64914
> commit: 7ee8acbb76bd440a8985a4b2a20b75521c6853ed
> 
> If I understand correctly then the GDK Pixbuf build regression was introduced between commits bc587eb178799ccb9bd051f8f46569e1673a9991 and e3388d6361dedabb2f6df9cdd5cc98e6cac7f457, sometime between Wednesday 11th December and Wednesday 22nd January, which narrows down to 6 weeks where I didn't use Guix.
> 	I hope the detail helps you fix the regression.
> 

The current HEAD of Guix has gdk-pixbuf-2.40.0. What's the output of
`which -a guix` and `guix describe`? It sounds like you're using an
older version.

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim@flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted