From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tanguy Le Carrour <tanguy@bioneland.org>
Subject: Re: Changing user-account's shell
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 23:24:27 +0200
Message-ID: <20190419212427.jaywhuyzefv2hcek@melmoth>
References: <20190417195944.v3duu4wzh7sqj7dk@melmoth>
	<87d0lkz5jw.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
	<20190418202248.rnemtiamtofyh6z7@melmoth>
	<87imvaiizo.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54466)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tanguy@bioneland.org>) id 1hHb2H-0000YG-VU
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 17:27:06 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <tanguy@bioneland.org>) id 1hHazo-0003nB-Ox
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 17:24:33 -0400
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:54911)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <tanguy@bioneland.org>)
	id 1hHazo-0003mY-J6
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 17:24:32 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87imvaiizo.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
List-Id: <help-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:help-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Help-Guix" <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>
Cc: help-guix@gnu.org

Le 04/19, Pierre Neidhardt a écrit :
> Tanguy Le Carrour <tanguy@bioneland.org> writes:
> > Unfortunately, calling Fish from Bash is not really sexy! This is what I
> > do on systems where I cannot set my default shell and I don't like to have to
> > do one extra ctrl+d to close a terminal. ^_^'
> 
> You would not, because when you run
> 
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> exec fish "$@"
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> 
> it replaces the Bash process, so exiting Fish would effectively
> terminate the direct child process of the terminal which would then close
> automatically.

Oh oh oh… and now I understand the difference between `fish` and `exec
fish`! ^_^' … It works perfectly!

I still don't know if I'll go for this solution or the `chsh` as
suggested by Ludo'.

Regards

-- 
Tanguy