From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Bavier <ericbavier@openmailbox.org>
Subject: Re: [UX] real names exposed
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 22:09:26 -0500
Message-ID: <20160905220926.47e7e37b@openmailbox.org>
References: <147266794967.23966.13712862947716543821@what>
	<20160831231110.GB18814@jasmine>
	<b38f200f5083ed65d1813e281f9e8cd0@openmailbox.org>
	<87wpiwt2qx.fsf@gnu.org> <87bn04k40m.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87poojihbm.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44388)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ericbavier@openmailbox.org>) id 1bh6lX-00072p-Sn
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2016 23:09:40 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ericbavier@openmailbox.org>) id 1bh6lU-0002Kk-Ie
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2016 23:09:39 -0400
Received: from smtp10.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.44]:50677)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ericbavier@openmailbox.org>) id 1bh6lU-0002KF-CV
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2016 23:09:36 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87poojihbm.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: <help-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:help-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Help-Guix" <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?B?Q291cnTDqHM=?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: help-guix@gnu.org, Help-Guix <help-guix-bounces+ericbavier=openmailbox.org@gnu.org>

On Sun, 04 Sep 2016 21:41:01 +0200
ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) wrote:

> While playing with =E2=80=98wrap-program=E2=80=99, I rewrote it so create=
 a single
> wrapper and modify that wrapper when it exists instead of layering an
> extra wrapper.
>=20
> Thoughts?  If there are no objections, I=E2=80=99d like to commit this on=
e.

Seems reasonable to me.

`~Eric