From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: Re: gnunet-svn Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 22:26:11 +0000 Message-ID: <20160608222611.GA4048@khazad-dum> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42218) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bAmLV-0002NV-1k for help-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2016 18:53:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bAmLQ-0005OA-VY for help-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2016 18:53:08 -0400 Received: from 93-95-228-168.1984.is ([93.95.228.168]:45339 helo=beleriand.n0.is) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bAmLQ-0005Mj-In for help-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2016 18:53:04 -0400 Received: by beleriand.n0.is (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 58599768 TLS version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2016 22:26:18 +0000 (UTC) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" To: help-guix --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2016-06-08(10:04:37+0200), Catonano wrote: > I read an interesting thread about some work being done to package a svn > version of gnunet in Guix > > It's here > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-03/msg00464.html > > How did it end ? I see no gnunet-svn among the packages. > > I'd love to play with gnunet > > There was a fix on the description to be done > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-03/msg01409.html > > There was a test on python-zbar (and qrcodes ?) > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-03/msg01366.html > > There was a typo to fix > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-03/msg01358.html Yes, this is still going on. I had to find and report some bugs with gnunet, found some of them while I went to finish the gentoo package of it, did much discussion over the last months, but -svn will definitely be finished soon, as I can merge back what= I gained from fixing up gnunet on gentoo. I just put it on pause for a while, but we had some discussions, and while I'm still pushing to get GNUnet into portage of gentoo, we think it's easier to push for guix on gentoo (which is barely finished now, the base works). Thanks for the reminder, I'll definitely fix it this month or next one. -- =E2=99=A5=E2=92=B6 ng0 For non-prism friendly talk find me on psyced.org / loupsycedyglgamf.onion --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF4EARYKAAYFAldYm3sACgkQhhoAchyzrCDkNgEAgSjCkCLeyvTwgzqpB/CcpgCo zuEupjzZTnFhc2i4htAA/ArWssi0vNi+Uqxr8X+8QjrVrkNulA25gXfTyRJ8LqgG =X7Kw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM--