From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: guix edit mutt -- with new option, and dependency, how I got it working Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 16:34:33 -0500 Message-ID: <20160310213433.GA9444@jasmine> References: <20160310004446.GA23830@protected.rcdrun.com> <20160310014522.GB29687@jasmine> <20160310065806.GA2618@protected.rcdrun.com> <20160310204551.GA7510@jasmine> <20160310230649.4cced66d@debian-netbook> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52242) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ae8E6-0004lW-Oo for help-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 16:34:35 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ae8E1-0002EU-QS for help-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 16:34:34 -0500 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:53530) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ae8E1-0002EQ-MY for help-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2016 16:34:29 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160310230649.4cced66d@debian-netbook> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Efraim Flashner Cc: help-guix@gnu.org On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:06:49PM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote: > On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 15:45:51 -0500 > Leo Famulari wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 07:58:06AM +0100, Jean Louis wrote: > > [...] > > > > I'm really glad you mentioned this on our list! My "Archive" mail folder > > has ~30000 messages, and I rarely opened it because of how long it would > > take Mutt to load them all. With this option enabled, it loads almost > > instantly, once the cache is created. > > > > :) > > sounds like it'd be good to enable > > > > > I agree that we should build our Mutt with this option enabled. > > > > If everyone agrees, the question is which database to use — we have gdbm > > and bdb in our package tree (I think tokyocabinet is a WIP). I have no > > idea which database is a better choice. What do people think? > > Assuming mutt, gdbm and bdb build on all architectures, comparing guix graph > of mutt, gdbm and bdb, and the graph of the two databases is identical. The > only other input I have is that debian uses tokyocabinet as a dependancy. It looks like they both build on all architectures. Gdbm is a little smaller and it's a GNU project, so I vote for gdbm, in the absence of any knowledge of the two databases' technical merits. > > -- > Efraim Flashner אפרים פלשנר > GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 > Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted