From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il>
Cc: help-guix@gnu.org
Subject: Re: guix edit mutt -- with new option, and dependency, how I got it working
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 16:34:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160310213433.GA9444@jasmine> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160310230649.4cced66d@debian-netbook>
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:06:49PM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 15:45:51 -0500
> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 07:58:06AM +0100, Jean Louis wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > I'm really glad you mentioned this on our list! My "Archive" mail folder
> > has ~30000 messages, and I rarely opened it because of how long it would
> > take Mutt to load them all. With this option enabled, it loads almost
> > instantly, once the cache is created.
> >
> > :)
>
> sounds like it'd be good to enable
>
> >
> > I agree that we should build our Mutt with this option enabled.
> >
> > If everyone agrees, the question is which database to use — we have gdbm
> > and bdb in our package tree (I think tokyocabinet is a WIP). I have no
> > idea which database is a better choice. What do people think?
>
> Assuming mutt, gdbm and bdb build on all architectures, comparing guix graph
> of mutt, gdbm and bdb, and the graph of the two databases is identical. The
> only other input I have is that debian uses tokyocabinet as a dependancy.
It looks like they both build on all architectures.
Gdbm is a little smaller and it's a GNU project, so I vote for gdbm, in
the absence of any knowledge of the two databases' technical merits.
>
> --
> Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר
> GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
> Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-10 21:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-10 0:44 guix edit mutt -- with new option, and dependency, how I got it working Jean Louis
2016-03-10 1:45 ` Leo Famulari
2016-03-10 6:58 ` Jean Louis
2016-03-10 20:45 ` Leo Famulari
2016-03-10 21:06 ` Efraim Flashner
2016-03-10 21:34 ` Leo Famulari [this message]
2016-03-11 13:37 ` Ludovic Courtès
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160310213433.GA9444@jasmine \
--to=leo@famulari.name \
--cc=efraim@flashner.co.il \
--cc=help-guix@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).