From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id ECY3JKT9AWQaTQEAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 15:01:08 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id CPIxJKT9AWTl/wAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 15:01:08 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 705393152D for ; Fri, 3 Mar 2023 15:01:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pY5xr-0004cR-UG; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 09:00:51 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pY5xq-0004cI-Sk for help-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 09:00:50 -0500 Received: from smtpmciv2.myservices.hosting ([185.26.107.238]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pY5xp-0007Qb-B3 for help-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 09:00:50 -0500 Received: from smtpmciv6.myservices.hosting (smtpmciv6.myservices.hosting [185.26.106.201]) by smtpmciv2.myservices.hosting (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CAD820D86; Fri, 3 Mar 2023 15:00:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail1.netim.hosting (unknown [185.26.106.173]) by smtpmciv6.myservices.hosting (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3533D2084B; Fri, 3 Mar 2023 15:00:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail1.netim.hosting (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE40480097; Fri, 3 Mar 2023 15:00:30 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail1.netim.hosting Received: from mail1.netim.hosting ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail1-2.netim.hosting [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id NZj_vmdpGPEL; Fri, 3 Mar 2023 15:00:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.239] (unknown [10.192.1.83]) (Authenticated sender: lumen@makinata.eu) by mail1.netim.hosting (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4044F80079; Fri, 3 Mar 2023 15:00:29 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <1bbcf3d3-2318-e589-2d29-8d6d616ed47b@makinata.eu> Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2023 14:00:20 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.8.0 Subject: Re: Examples of local-host-entries or hosts-service-type? Content-Language: en-US To: Remco van 't Veer Cc: Sergiu Ivanov , help-guix@gnu.org References: <87k00pi15e.fsf@colimite.fr> <87r0uw4e78.fsf@remworks.net> <06820a20-4a77-1707-a289-b83afdf7b026@makinata.eu> <87cz5vmxt9.fsf@remworks.net> <931ac97b-c1a1-f35e-02c9-cfbaa4ec2b08@makinata.eu> <87sfenletq.fsf@remworks.net> From: Bruno Victal In-Reply-To: <87sfenletq.fsf@remworks.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.26.107.238; envelope-from=mirai@makinata.eu; helo=smtpmciv2.myservices.hosting X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.089, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-guix@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1677852068; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=VESUIphoZIJJbgQMWV1yfJUHDYHhYreiBQI85/TucGKkY3Q8XN8SMOXao/4bDNPuK+0wvB lvITVPyB5qrbrVsdph5c2rimeYALA5vSnqD79JoRuTU1SuKaprrrPdRj9+fOfy/fuQGrv8 upE9w+v7DKmPz7yzg5eQGhfqT7m5MkBazop2ZIDlns/gmLbBTATQbtmx09woC/SL5NdOHw FzNQQtv9Viqb7sdDRBhfNtFFgJ8cmp/osY+q39X3d6QMzHk1FrywUjgEUnmCPBsu94OBUH pPKy8go4Xk0gL9i/+cL1aHOdojT7E3B/4XBCwr97FNWytgYimubsO0VN/6qqKg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1677852068; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=Q1xZfeCJxLtTrsUtiByP9cWQJZs0fxWO2kTdwWJ5bJ8=; b=qZwW96dEtPxAxWXPuBo2W3NEEIKyCnRfvjZeJkicryJ0UOd+3QSq4mb1XXFrnMdYrrQT7w bmxhKRAYo7fAZNjxmgXP5tkAjTwehldS9XO6ruJsjgbhhwq0pJqU6GzV+x+mqBsiDkLV6R EqegtUOJIsFlufXNVEkHVcQDgyCv5RM5yF2ClFH3PmYM02EzGrWIPX5geOLGzPE14mr+nA H7JI4YLES4ulf+0sf506jWw6lwYWaDAlS11S0M4k+ttIQURCtvV+PZahWywM7pIdPehK5t NEvT/htn1rktvy5Rk0mTX5XShZZAPSYYsjoG+Jsv2kzkYqBUDu8y1eccD6ZKzQ== X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -0.50 X-Spam-Score: -0.50 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 705393152D Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none X-TUID: JIte8K4tNMp9 On 2023-03-02 08:47, Remco van 't Veer wrote: > I not sure all applications will react well to having multiple entries > for the same IP-address. [...] > > From the hosts(5) manpage: > >> This file is a simple text file that associates IP addresses with >> hostnames, one line per IP address. It doesn't state that the IP addresses must be unique. Were that the case then blacklists such as which employ the hosts file method would be broken. AFAIK this method has around for a long time, I don't see this behavior changing anytime soon even if it turned out to be "against spec". Cheers, Bruno