From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id EBEaH283bWbMLgEA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2024 06:40:47 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id EBEaH283bWbMLgEA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2024 08:40:47 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=landt.email header.s=MBO0001 header.b=Qg2IU69J; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=landt.email; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1718433647; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=UCeXygfzBBQUtjMzLtQTe8A69hjxJLLuwcrCG8UIZ9CwWJoldg3o/pOkk+wiIFVCvQjPNR GuFu0dgKMTnGNeVzKTqt6kOTWFzMPz72nQrGs0zEMoxfBGlabrzRD4D6a01pxYc9r2jHZx DPsaMTseISNduv1ytA2fyapFe8inE7fSmZVVYXmQxesBpXOuJUH8abzRquSBx3TCltRcIC Pgke5qicG+zkz67YFvQwVK//V3HifkW4Bc+HEhZsdDwkehnq6YJZGv+GxvLr4i2gs6Q3sw GvChuoj/hrkFzaVqe87hhBJI9vF3GWH2cAJ4oAbde+jmpqFjbmAaWoBbRX/PMw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=landt.email header.s=MBO0001 header.b=Qg2IU69J; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=landt.email; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1718433647; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=w2YgOSyAwlK7tsfCRlKMW+ICgvtMPzaeV1lB71qAYJk=; b=HHdwxbzcwaDZVac2UByZBaKc3nc7fLZNBgtpByPM+tQmc7f7H5X2DUWVc8LZBrZihqjw9z KoNr7PeIvJHV23NHECR48Nq44ASiULhe6UvJlz2bo5fV894aze+dQG1FDaAO0HXGSHWeHW WHrJd00cJPPd/UyZiCKqJx0Hzt/K2PZSQx+Qv0frPrZQzL0HzxPYCMSoTEqG4TNvBdnlUT JmQT8uOH3WnvJvfY8KHyTktNj3Tom8hRaX9pcSEDl1MxPPzAXLR6Cen6lvk36Kgj9rBP8W gxTBWopgIOTj+KbWwSpYRs+FgIv10krfzzAf9XTHjum0alV37EScwn6lw0ez+Q== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6214A1E77D for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2024 08:40:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sIN56-00043F-RK; Sat, 15 Jun 2024 02:40:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sIN55-000434-Du for help-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2024 02:40:07 -0400 Received: from mout-p-103.mailbox.org ([2001:67c:2050:0:465::103]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sIN53-00024l-Fo for help-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2024 02:40:07 -0400 Received: from smtp202.mailbox.org (smtp202.mailbox.org [10.196.197.202]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-103.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4W1RMv2cymz9sss; Sat, 15 Jun 2024 08:39:55 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=landt.email; s=MBO0001; t=1718433595; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=w2YgOSyAwlK7tsfCRlKMW+ICgvtMPzaeV1lB71qAYJk=; b=Qg2IU69J6GBDX216aMgyw5whY39eFfr43/kvCwUAEdfv3beVSYGO+sNNS/0JsAmBQJSw7u uYLfHjvZFnpadRGgaLkckl0eOPCjg4lmyWP+9+K+Mp7lEQHbuUc/gc/GnMXkL8ga9l1e/K WwOsFo8xOnEX5E39bKXGrGzYA8A0sPwUSE8Zf5UplG9mVvnbBK7fqlqWWtp/jijWj0e8pH Bqq2KFTbtp5myJkm5F4SCHvTHdwRhPyPIUOnbqlxOogZUMNoAsEQiSVnmdGTghMwEgNWaF ox15aPrdcgqbeoIhB/Gd4zPAFXhofpIhi3W0p4euEgCAGLuuqXJww+kvWrprwA== Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 08:39:54 +0200 (CEST) From: Nils Landt To: Andreas Enge Cc: help-guix Message-ID: <1316652277.63955.1718433594861@office.mailbox.org> In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: Ruby without RVM - what to do if the version I want is missing? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:67c:2050:0:465::103; envelope-from=nils@landt.email; helo=mout-p-103.mailbox.org X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-guix@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: help-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 6214A1E77D X-Migadu-Scanner: mx12.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -8.80 X-Spam-Score: -8.80 X-TUID: PW75goAABQ2+ > Andreas Enge hat am 14.06.2024 19:36 CEST geschrieben: > > An interesting question would be whether all the packages that still depend > on ruby@3.1 can use ruby@3.2 or ruby@3.3 instead. There are breaking changes between these Ruby versions. For most packages, upgrading Ruby and having the tests run would work, but I count 209 packages with tests disabled (I did not check how many of them run on 2.7). Personally, I wouldn't want to risk it :) > And whether we still need ruby@2.6 in addition to ruby@2.7; no package > depends on the former. Probably not, end of support for Ruby 2.6 was 2022-04-12. Fwiw, end of support for 2.7 was 2023-03-30. The 2.7 -> 3.0 migration was pretty big in the Ruby ecosystem, I wouldn't expect there to be a lot of open source applications running 2.7 any more. Having a quick look at (gnu packagages ruby), very few packages still depend on 2.7.