unofficial mirror of guix-science@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Giovanni Biscuolo <giovanni@biscuolo.net>
To: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludovic.courtes@inria.fr>, guix-science@gnu.org
Subject: Re: A guide to reproducible research papers
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 12:37:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h6qqo8ot.fsf@xelera.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87o7l633v7.fsf@inria.fr>

Hello!

Ludovic Courtès <ludovic.courtes@inria.fr> writes:

> At long last, we’ve written a guide explaining why and more importantly
> how (with step-by-step instructions) to provide reproducible
> computational experiments accompanying research articles:
>
>   https://hpc.guix.info/blog/2023/06/a-guide-to-reproducible-research-papers/
>
> Please share!  :-)

thank you all for this great article, I'll share it à gogò!

You mentioned this citation from Jon Claerbout:

 Published documents are merely the advertisement of scholarship whereas
 the computer programs, input data, parameter values, etc. embody the
 scholarship itself.

and I was very curious about the source: I found that's a citation from
the abstract of «Making scientc computations reproducible» (Matthias
Schwab , Martin Karrenbach, Jon Claerbout, Published 2000) [1]

Nevertheless, the first occurrence of a similar statement by Jon
Claerbout is in a talk named «Seventeen years of super computing and
other problems in seismology» dated Oct 2 1994, precisely in the section
about "Technology transfer and research reproducibility" [2]

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---

In engineering, a published paper is an advertisement of scholarship but
the electronic document can be the scholarship itself. Forty years ago
data were "pencil marks on paper" and theory was some Greek
symbols. Then paper documents were adequate. No more. Now we need
electronic documents.

--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Just to add a little bit of history of computational reproducibility of
research.

Happy hacking! Gio'


[1] https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.10.3712
complete PDF here: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/doc/10.1.1.10.3712

[2] https://sepwww.stanford.edu/sep/jon/nrc.html#Technology%20transfer%20and%20research%20reproducibility

-- 
Giovanni Biscuolo

«Si può sperare
 Che il mondo torni a quote più normali».


  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-29 13:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-23  9:49 A guide to reproducible research papers Ludovic Courtès
2023-06-29 10:37 ` Giovanni Biscuolo [this message]
2023-06-29 10:54   ` Ludovic Courtès

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87h6qqo8ot.fsf@xelera.eu \
    --to=giovanni@biscuolo.net \
    --cc=guix-science@gnu.org \
    --cc=ludovic.courtes@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).