From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id mA6tFSOSXWJQYAAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 18:30:27 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id EDilFSOSXWLUawAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 18:30:27 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D488945578 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 18:30:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:48344 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ngUGc-0005RN-Mx for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 12:30:23 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36694) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ngUGK-0005Pt-38 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 12:30:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46656) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ngUGJ-00053d-Q6 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 12:30:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ngUGJ-0003bp-JU for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 12:30:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#54953] (No Subject) References: In-Reply-To: Resent-From: Maya Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 16:30:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 54953 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: "54953@debbugs.gnu.org" <54953@debbugs.gnu.org> Received: via spool by 54953-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B54953.165029934313757 (code B ref 54953); Mon, 18 Apr 2022 16:30:03 +0000 Received: (at 54953) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Apr 2022 16:29:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40553 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ngUFL-0003Zp-G6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 12:29:03 -0400 Received: from mail-4324.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.24]:57741) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ngUFK-0003ZE-25 for 54953@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2022 12:29:02 -0400 Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 16:28:51 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail; t=1650299335; bh=KozZdTVwQwJjalzBrN2DvAmaIdDOZyvh4Zq7n6i+KXo=; h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:Message-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject: Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID; b=p7YgUPT4cMj25pQpTdPe48hElyakJJb5M4DFSFrYRDW6bTkNMMpkCAPsUsVeAhw1W LDrnoqbgIqYj62Fl/Vqu3rPecFeOoR/XTSU6c8jzhue/kodygYuetDFzWf2j/bFjX0 fNZjpXHurc7YAKT8WaB6JOXTPvxo/I9n6jG30o7Uq4ubcPxzCOTsI76R/Ohthjemrf GA9TjJyA3K1vpShf587Thyot+zcslYXK6OwES4729Y9/AXRk2s6I8dr2LcJESWrjma JGGsjMQIg9LtI+Z4Fck+whffN+sGE0soXgda+q13CkyPD9qNk3brFkqAmBeas+Aq2D DyHe/JIETux7g== Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" Reply-to: Maya X-ACL-Warn: , Maya via Guix-patches From: Maya via Guix-patches via X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-To: larch@yhetil.org X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1650299427; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=KozZdTVwQwJjalzBrN2DvAmaIdDOZyvh4Zq7n6i+KXo=; b=txfiShaXxEQ7YbfvkojBXIVyyr1vRQy7ZmHqA17RTdVxzzP3QcE2VHsO0P2ucK13FYjcIu wxGeAYE4VyRIkkuvgeTxqJ26MaHpNYXViGKURgTRlEcOVcfJKJIwSCwWaJeJVACCYOEBS6 A9ooShqon1vm/HTzKIwZ3NFaUqFxIHqyTj2W/jxrh3KND01nEw8cMK5CUikXjG0H7QDjqR urtpbCPSlfzfQnWp5WZrtgdsYivizd+aLBzaYOgIHS6ybKaFuXpF3S62V9/MvSOGM+f5Kc nzIQDjyt8IuUjfup/xj7IuwkqLrWNCnpZTSqCHFDJyzM5nHC0+44ae+fk8/7IQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1650299427; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=if/UCQOyF8QqQ3fy+chDAI/yDLYcI/z4ET9atcSZfqlfZpGgLF0QHoMk3a7NYW7CorBgRq YbPuF9BsRAz7D/FKBwny4C+c7NE9pviUQG8wy7eHFhccBD45/EkYP3Ig6A5XZqJJyDkkrh vsIDfbQM74WBslG2Y0F0QbLgJKxjpDFsCNNs7/ce4B6jcUwl9McAHcKqCrHM2Onbvftkbe 1Vvy9cVwR2BY5DdYvlo8Gvb1mCV+qOsDeT1/9NyqltZ8nbgzGtX7NzcTw0RqDjjZqSOFgH tPkzPqkD0a3cBdi6YHHe+IFRXEj8dt+4O4S1lc6yQ4b/NxbGMYtymy/szZPy2Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail header.b=p7YgUPT4; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.54 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail header.b=p7YgUPT4; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: D488945578 X-Spam-Score: -3.54 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: fwpFyw7FQ4rI > > > Here too I would suggest @code{nano-theme} or this-theme. > > It sounds better. However does it matter that it now will not match > > guix package name but match the emacs package name? > That's fine imo. IIUC nano-theme would be a feature that you can > (require), no? Yes it is a emacs package of that name. You also then load-theme it, so I g= uess it's fine. > > > "It is recommended to use a font with programming ligatures, such > > > as @code{font-google-roboto}". On that note, does Roboto have > > > programming ligatures? > > It sadly does not. But Roboto Mono Nerd is not packaged for guix and > > I haven't checked the license on their assets yet. I believe that > > Roboto Mono is recommended as a aesthetic matching font. > Last time I checked, Nerd fonts were a special kind of mess that's > difficult to disentangle and more difficult to check licenses on. I > wouldn't bother too hard. It looks like it. I didn't felt comfortable packaging it as it looked like = they automatically download copyrighted content. > Is the recommendation important in your opinion? There is kind of a problem with that. The nano-theme package also provides = a method of setting other not theme-related functionality under the nano-mo= de function. But that function prints an error if Roboto Mono Nerd isn't pr= esent on the system. (but does not fail) As for the recommendation of the Roboto Mono itself, I don't know. The nano= packages are all about aesthetics. And the theme optionally sets faces to = Roboto (or Fira Code as a fallback font). Weirdly enough, the code also set= s some faces to Victor Mono, but there is no mention of that in the package= description. The longer I'm looking at the code, the weirder it gets. It seems like it's= not only a them per-se. But rather a visual style that kind-of breaks the = borders of normal emacs theme. Best, Maya