From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id wDLGN+wd32WiWAEA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 12:50:05 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id wDLGN+wd32WiWAEA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 12:50:05 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=laesvuori.fi header.s=mail header.b=EHZMIqRR; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1709121004; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=R2ZXXg6X7XixVuxgXWVt2QVbJGVEjmzjRUHMNIABS9g=; b=joqhbuOeUNcsnhF9unYm4saCunqbhsAE3TQHpLZKhnnqkO1FRcrh0F7VhfNzJOUkHWsda1 qlNJ90FtJKf4/661cTI4ybsu34TSfC8J8nlW/K/6RsQQYqY5e+gPMvE5pMN+IPCSH24rfS IpBtPM2uB8FYY/NJ/ODvvokwCZRgcqO1v/Rb0eTDmY5UEAP9xYGdZl5Eiu7TiHS1K1rTmn sanIUWTyqkQ4SwkZDTaiwMy93srIiLzIWnAS1kS1ZecvJKL9o8DKP1AlBFFd8zNJuvkrcr WhwPlqo/WRFmeIHVIzf4dlcOa5zIP0l3ED5yG0VoDPC7FSDecVEgODOR/OpEOA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=laesvuori.fi header.s=mail header.b=EHZMIqRR; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1709121004; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=jM9CY9deMbnPFJMmV7Ae9+3a1Xo3QvoyJpQCpeZAZ/P7pRveL0QSQpmm1rWTXdBeXSPynO lIGm28l7tXq0IBEHvUMMd4D3za6RKdFry8rWX12Ks5dNt6lNXCI8r66eQ6YpGEE/TGcxsL 2MLHol94eNrqB3Uu4k07zv7qoOBLYVVcfjiWEjWH2ux+rO0+19QhFONzICN5AlH8mVcgNe yS5Ntb0nBeyIKU9e1JXOibhmHz2ZdF+/Jg+/hIovjXID/anperq+HBwrIG3DWEEuecuq8M VawODgL6wvSf4Gy20SKyuUEFPlBVOqGo09sIo0naeAyXX7xPTKT9nK4S3iyQPA== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A51169278 for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 12:50:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rfIQU-0002oN-Ci; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 06:48:42 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rfIQO-0002Iv-Mb for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 06:48:39 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rfIQN-0003WH-Jk for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 06:48:36 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rfIQn-0007qm-TE for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 06:49:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#69068] To test or not to test? Resent-From: Saku Laesvuori Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 11:49:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69068 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Andreas Enge Cc: 69068@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 69068-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B69068.170912090029890 (code B ref 69068); Wed, 28 Feb 2024 11:49:01 +0000 Received: (at 69068) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Feb 2024 11:48:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33419 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rfIQ7-0007m2-PA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 06:48:20 -0500 Received: from vmi571514.contaboserver.net ([75.119.130.101]:42972 helo=mail.laesvuori.fi) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rfIQ5-0007lj-Kx for 69068@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 06:48:18 -0500 Received: from X-kone (unknown [130.233.144.71]) by mail.laesvuori.fi (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3CC193400F9; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 12:48:34 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=laesvuori.fi; s=mail; t=1709120914; bh=R2ZXXg6X7XixVuxgXWVt2QVbJGVEjmzjRUHMNIABS9g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=EHZMIqRRz23I3a+cgFX1LXqmwrWb2+30Nm6BOkuCjdrdfyxsB0e7LFRq+fwoMKuaH v9P3qcKR3Z+doCD+zghaJdIEPYBNE0ny5wYQbKBlIc92O0SeCJtU5hslPg3wE9NNBC JCpr/AKnwt1kOYY550X8E6A7Ust+5lKnqkqk0i3U= Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 13:47:47 +0200 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="v745dber6pxghqsg" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Saku Laesvuori X-ACL-Warn: , Saku Laesvuori via Guix-patches From: Saku Laesvuori via Guix-patches via Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -7.37 X-Spam-Score: -7.37 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 6A51169278 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx11.migadu.com X-TUID: 50kpG8OouXpi --v745dber6pxghqsg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 11:32:43AM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I also looked at this just now and am confused by the test situation. > Should one not either disable tests altogether, or just comment out > some of them? I don't believe any of them even compile with Qt6. The test suite has been unmaintained for years, so it doesn't really tell anything about whether the program works correctly or not. I would certainly agree that it is better to remove just the failing ones if the issues were actual test failures due to how Guix packaging works. Here the problem is that the project effectively no longer has a test suite. --v745dber6pxghqsg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEoMkZR3NPB29fCOn/JX0oSiodOjIFAmXfHWMACgkQJX0oSiod OjL1pxAAmUz+aHKdZnpralyIAybMnbtdKr7Od0QHlm+iJHAnwZ1602CTGiqcHZk3 KW6f0AM76VgvHOLEFPggQ4rD0lvEC/U1mf6tnpMlosx71KPLLLeeg3yQFGmeyGo4 AQITteuQRNssq1xrYkVGw5yLYyperqeSQCBCdtGszEEufEH2zVF1duCFXIWJFU+1 IPDWDxD8zEvwlfWGGZMcLWmw97FHb/JoJwvytAgnuWxhlIbDsqjfi1fwg83mHS8z h1v4EmhoCvcMg2baKcgJCrBxbXe6H/YhoIeTRyXPHfm/AzOnO/mCIOMm3nTCCB2m JyjuXz9l1yYeByZN+v9uu8tTHSteZ9vvYRnNCMzIzh0QqDtXiekUXNdF5BuLWpKY 0G3T64QdiprH4JXj/KqV8Y7XTBZlsPdZ1TwD39UR60XtinYbH5CMP8gLc07cWuE8 W61BpESYP9WHLHrx8wdJ9Z1HU+0FJ0XTYSDr5KpbxDPykKf2b9I4Qnc56RzVlwTb w5ojKwK6n5xSZatwhPauyKPWICBLlTVLDY56e6/0bLaVujboB0eTYI0p/xWnBUHV DYY4lsqhDut1ER30vevhZLPr1Lid9xZ3dXcgvpeu4LU6K5K8VuW/Dcfmvt5ABfRa gXRGXB8nhdCSHns53rIdI21c7+XF0RoocgjMbol+dDLBDrcp2KU= =WBrs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --v745dber6pxghqsg--