From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45336) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dBIg5-0007JC-Sd for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 18 May 2017 06:29:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dBIg2-0002zz-Oq for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 18 May 2017 06:29:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:49292) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dBIg2-0002zv-L1 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 18 May 2017 06:29:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dBIg2-0006SG-Fb for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 18 May 2017 06:29:02 -0400 Subject: bug#26966: [PATCH 22/22] gnu: Remove GCJ. Resent-Message-ID: References: <20170517171905.7840-1-rekado@elephly.net> <20170517171905.7840-22-rekado@elephly.net> <87bmqqlbwp.fsf@elephly.net> From: Roel Janssen In-reply-to: <87bmqqlbwp.fsf@elephly.net> Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 12:28:17 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: 26966@debbugs.gnu.org Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Roel Janssen writes: > >> Ricardo Wurmus writes: >> >>> * gnu/packages/patches/gcj-arm-mode.patch: Remove file. >>> * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Delete it. >>> * gnu/packages/gcc.scm (javac.in, gcj, ecj-bootstrap): Remove variables. >>> --- > […] >> Ok, so this is not needed anymore to bootstrap the JDK, but isn't there >> any other use for/user of GCJ? > > It has been removed from the GCC sources and is no longer maintained, > and it contains pre-built binaries. I don’t think we should continue to > support it. We have no other users in Guix (I used to build Tuxguitar > with it, but later switched to IcedTea’s JDK) and the majority of all > users of GCJ work just fine with the OpenJDK. Okay. I personally don't use GCJ either. If anyone uses it, now is the time to speak up.. :-) If nobody else has a problem with removing it, then this is LGTM. Kind regards, Roel Janssen