From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id wGzyNTZJo18GdgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 00:37:10 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id SDvXMTZJo1+JeQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 00:37:10 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 322B79402A9 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 00:37:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:43860 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kaTH2-0004De-Mn for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 19:37:08 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33032) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kaTGw-0004DV-J5 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 19:37:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39471) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kaTGw-0003Qe-AR for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 19:37:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kaTGw-0004LA-4q for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 19:37:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#43871] [PATCH website] Add community page Resent-From: Luis Felipe Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2020 00:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43871 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: zimoun Cc: Julien Lepiller , "43871@debbugs.gnu.org" <43871@debbugs.gnu.org> Received: via spool by 43871-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43871.160453660416658 (code B ref 43871); Thu, 05 Nov 2020 00:37:02 +0000 Received: (at 43871) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Nov 2020 00:36:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51017 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kaTGd-0004Kc-KH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 19:36:43 -0500 Received: from mail-40135.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.135]:51524) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kaTGY-0004KM-SH for 43871@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 19:36:42 -0500 Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2020 00:36:24 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail; t=1604536592; bh=AvX9w3sM9vBpY7+HfMPosTg18R/XGc2cVfLNm7th+Rs=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=hsSJqK2bK3iQnzKoDZ6au/xAc0RrFANKvAnWO14rVRUzbCOwm0fm7niKz0/vhdaqR vKBtgzn1rrTgYhtXnAbRw/6BAPgbLN+lqpHT9milozu21z3yFJvfotqgX7IQOVWv0U ZD27iDQ6clQqtjGdBRBp/DZjudMANHtu0r1fpIuc= Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <20201009003823.0a15114b@tachikoma> <86y2jhflum.fsf@gmail.com> <373YkYHCW3Nyxj8_fDQDiWvZ8oBLPx2scPrJ0x9AoavwqwnQk76IuGg6l3kHZpWIxtrp_GnQ_dJpViB3MYNUzO529PKVgOxmCvtOB-RzX40=@protonmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" Reply-to: Luis Felipe , Luis Felipe via Guix-patches From: Luis Felipe via Guix-patches via X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail header.b=hsSJqK2b; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.51 X-TUID: WgU9gPjQZXOO =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 Original Me= ssage =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 On Wednesday, November 4, 2020 6:31 PM, zimoun w= rote: > Dear, > > On Wed, 4 Nov 2020 at 17:12, Luis Felipe luis.felipe.la@protonmail.com wr= ote: > > > Or maybe add it to the Packages menu item? For example: > > Packages (/LANG/packages/) > > Channels (/LANG/packages/channels/ or /LANG/channels/) > > Ok. Maybe it is better. > > > Also, the Packages page could also mention that that list of packages c= omes from the Guix channel, but more packages are available from other chan= nels (and link to the new list of channels). > > You mean add one sentence in the header of: > > http://guix.gnu.org/en/packages/ > > right? I mean, modify the introductory paragraph. For example: =C2=B7=C2=B7=C2=B7 GNU Guix provides 15,183 packages transparently available as pre-built bina= ries. These pages provide a complete list of the packages IN GUIX CHANNELS.= Our continuous integration system shows their current build status (update= d November 4, 2020). CHECK THE CHANNELS PAGE TO LEARN ABOUT OTHER CHANNELS = THAT PROVIDE ADDITIONAL FREE SOFTWARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE GUIX CHANNEL. =C2=B7=C2=B7=C2=B7 Or something like that. And maybe the first use of the term "channel" in th= at paragraph should be linked to the definition of a channel in the manual. > > I don't know about the "Community" part because I think the Guix commun= ity [is | will be] split into "Libre Only Community" and "Open Source with = Proprietary Comunity", so maybe each community should build their own websi= tes that better reflect their own goals? I don't know... > > I do not understand this last statement. The websiteguix.gnu.org is > "Libre Only"; because it is GNU. Therefore, the channels will be > FSDG-compliant packages only (often variants) and other channels > (often named 'nonfree') will be not listed here. For example, even on > hpc.guix.info which is more permissive, nonfree channels contributed > by Ludo and/or Ricardo) about specific HPC tools are not listed > overthere. What do you have in mind about "Open Source with > non-free"? Well, the thing is, when I read the word "Community" I think of the whole g= roup of GNU Guix users, contributors, and enthusiasts (including people who= use Guix with non-free software or who promote channels with non-free pack= ages). So I don't like the word "community" because it would not include th= e whole Guix community (the group of people who use/promote non-free stuff = would be excluded from the list).