From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46500)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1fn1Zr-0006d7-8b
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Aug 2018 08:59:08 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1fn1Zm-00047r-D9
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Aug 2018 08:59:07 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:38208)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1fn1Zm-00047e-6y
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Aug 2018 08:59:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1fn1Zl-00047F-PH
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Aug 2018 08:59:01 -0400
Subject: [bug#32355] [PATCH] gnu: racket: Update to 7.0
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.32355.B32355.153364669915768@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hinsen@fastmail.net>
In-Reply-To: <87pnyv1h94.fsf@posteo.net>
References: <m1zhy3243x.fsf@fastmail.net> <87pnyv1h94.fsf@posteo.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2018 14:58:13 +0200
Message-ID: <m1zhxyl4ey.fsf@fastmail.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Kei Kebreau <kkebreau@posteo.net>
Cc: 32355@debbugs.gnu.org

Kei Kebreau <kkebreau@posteo.net> writes:

> This looks okay, but when I build for armhf-linux using the qemu-binfmt
> service I get an error. It could just be because I'm using QEMU, so
> maybe someone with a native armhf-linux installation can verify.

Thanks for testing! I can't help with armhf, but if anyone is able to
explore it, please also try to compile Racket 7.0 in the "normal" way,
i.e. following the instructions coming with the source distribution,
because this crash might well be due to an upstream bug.

Konrad.