From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56207) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jJwIV-0000nr-Ln for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 05:38:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jJwIU-0005Al-NM for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 05:38:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55900) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jJwIU-0005Ae-Jn for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 05:38:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jJwIU-00049x-I9 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 05:38:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#40373] [PATCH] guix: new command "guix run-script" Resent-Message-ID: From: Konrad Hinsen In-Reply-To: References: <875zeiudjm.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 11:37:18 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: zimoun Cc: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , 40373@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Simon, > Maybe, we could deprecated "repl" and add "run" with: > - guix run (same than the "guix run-script" proposal) > - guix run or guix run --repl doing the what "guix repl" does. Yes, unifying the two functionalities under a new name is an interesting options. Could we go for "guix guile" and make it option-compatible with plain Guile as much as possible? Just an idea, I am not sure it's a good one! Guile can already be a pain in a shebang line. Cheers, Konrad