[bug#40373] [PATCH] guix: new command "guix run-script"

[Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hinsen@fastmail.net>]

Hi Simon,

>> That's very clever! The weak spot is the P, as script evaluation does
>> not print anything. We could make it print the script's return code ;-)
>
> Hum? The usual REPL neither. :-)

You mean... they have been LYING to us all the time... about the REPL?

> Quoting Wikipedia: "print function takes the result yielded by eval"
> but from my understanding 'eval' does not always yield a "printable"
> result, e.g., "(define foo 42)".

True, not always. But for scripts it's never. We have to find some nice
three-valued logic rhetoric that applies to all situations ;-)

Command line:
  - read an expression,
  - eval it,
  - print the result of the evaluation (if any),
  - and finally loop to process the next expression

Scripts:
  - read the script file1,
  - eval it,
  - print the textual output of the script (if any),
  - and finally loop if there is more than one script file.

That makes "print" look optional in both cases.

Cheers,
  Konrad.