From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55969)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jKITe-0002wJ-S5
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 05:19:03 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jKITe-0004o6-09
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 05:19:02 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57851)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1jKITd-0004ns-Sz
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 05:19:01 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jKITd-0005bT-NS
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 05:19:01 -0400
Subject: [bug#40373] [PATCH] guix: new command "guix run-script"
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.40373.B40373.158590548721383@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hinsen@fastmail.net>
In-Reply-To: <m1r1x6kz3l.fsf@khs-macbook.home>
References: <m1d08rmh6g.fsf@khs-macbook.home> <875zeiudjm.fsf@gnu.org>
 <m1a73umkbw.fsf@khs-macbook.home>
 <CAJ3okZ386b7bo7ME+CCJ4K=8QnCtq5F4cmhtONYAFnNGEE=BUw@mail.gmail.com>
 <m1r1x6kz3l.fsf@khs-macbook.home>
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2020 11:17:58 +0200
Message-ID: <m1eet59bcp.fsf@khs-macbook.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: 40373@debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>, zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>

Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hinsen@fastmail.net> writes:

> Could we go for "guix guile" and make it option-compatible with plain
> Guile as much as possible? Just an idea, I am not sure it's a good one!
> Guile can already be a pain in a shebang line.

After some exploration, that kind of compatibility doesn't seem worth
the effort.

I will send another patch that implements Simon's proposal:

 - New command "guix run" that extends "guix repl" by an optional
   file argument for running a script.
 - "guix repl" becomes an alias for "guix run" (and could in the
   long run be declared obsolete).

Cheers,
  Konrad.