From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id 2AlMO7kv4mV6EgEA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 20:42:50 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4876::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id 2AlMO7kv4mV6EgEA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 20:42:50 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=euhUXLxe; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1709322169; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-to: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=ujUB2lPdGsi381ygIEDMGB5+2JshD767tHcMThqzZqM=; b=gs0fM0FF3wwomNw8TqQOuAGa+e7i09j4HPXIhsobBN0W4cVpMb6Y4nV0XhvBnTVD3RATdc iKeQvC2FTAR727azYOpZ8X1Z6q6mdztCetlAQjqH41V9JZF4HyvvR+S7DvePbBNopA//BN 6RMXHHwq9A0bQ4xNRNCnbyBrq9lG13H6Zpzl9cas5cqKcKQ4NPIRFQJ+JhULruWEbYk1Fo oEilI+HH1mVb6UI8dJ/2KQzvRx5T9sVVSCOoS24KpCYR7onwDBUHYBPS0DeaUuRWHvJ47O R+E8HMz6dK2sR575WGlBP9Ik1NXphBcrLiQ97+a+NbFW8ke6hYgHjTiqx7Xnyw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=euhUXLxe; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1709322169; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=JlKlmmTJRTOhYHTcMJZ7dKOmQGWIDu15xIn/rPEgTKF9WdRv+ujc+fNc+oDrHOYzbEEZBn hxRVnzgwTx9M5aCePU6HbSpqtXP+JmH0sIL/fqYLOhXYnkEIL+fFKkTN/qDZSK/pwUbPGi Kja8a1wv6AFM75Zr2jDJoLgP3gOmNaku/SSC+nLZ9I0B/mD5ObWcSwYQh3GM5jnnp31ai+ sMh134lqYedggw1xEFoD6vE6bsIggIdUB6K1qNo3uAxRQ84VLPnBzD6kNcb1oOFKwVu1YG 3w8OTZfjrWB15cVK5MICwaj+A26UAib6soa8gQbDN5p83jiqMMncYq7v2CcvwQ== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E49B76B4C for ; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 20:42:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rg8mB-0001IP-NS; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 14:42:35 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rg8mA-0001I0-6S for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 14:42:34 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rg8m9-00049M-Ul for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 14:42:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rg8mb-0005yG-Rp for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 14:43:01 -0500 Subject: bug#67260: [PATCH emacs-team v11 0/7] You thought it was term/internal.el, but it was me, Dio! Resent-From: Liliana Marie Prikler Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2024 19:43:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 67260 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Suhail Cc: cox.katherine.e+guix@gmail.com, 67260-done@debbugs.gnu.org, andrew@trop.in Mail-Followup-To: 67260@debbugs.gnu.org, liliana.prikler@gmail.com, liliana.prikler@gmail.com Received: via spool by 67260-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D67260.170932213922886 (code D ref 67260); Fri, 01 Mar 2024 19:43:01 +0000 Received: (at 67260-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Mar 2024 19:42:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37514 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rg8lv-0005x4-0x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 14:42:19 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-f68.google.com ([209.85.218.68]:44259) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rg8ls-0005wq-86 for 67260-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 14:42:16 -0500 Received: by mail-ej1-f68.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a26fa294e56so471097466b.0 for <67260-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 11:41:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1709322042; x=1709926842; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ujUB2lPdGsi381ygIEDMGB5+2JshD767tHcMThqzZqM=; b=euhUXLxeNHNo4W+WEk8XVMRRg9Sze0Sos24WWAMHRbGlV8+vdztoh27fBldacvPhJW DnUpH9KPVTN2dW42jlM/t3kUYW/tgIsfIsVMRXh38EOviTB8/M7b4wIj8y6FZ1EceMUR bFaeFsAjhJT+hPHS74dxGv61/euUmk+6eDuh9NieB2E/t27RnTHQhPRwTyU8eQI5FYU0 xkddTF9LIiArZtphTqFPdnxMxxKOtYzOE6OMd/PuREo52w0B+QdtiaRtYp/wV1x+tdFm 1vPaLYxmaZF9ImWoOoJHktDbNJfWnKJ7MbnoIY0vus6N/tPM55+zZJad9D1vSgVfQYZV vpSg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1709322042; x=1709926842; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ujUB2lPdGsi381ygIEDMGB5+2JshD767tHcMThqzZqM=; b=LEFj60rCbssuMRt/pdBNe3F1YqqTU16lMScu2yZa7AE3b/D/PNiI7bZWTJmaIFa+NA P90AcdBPHBdjK5vAWn965yF66zYdHawHtHbmIBVEdxlId49+NklyHIagL+x4Z+s//tQ0 ZdISKYqTwiQ3fQZkwjm6IQhe+1sbn13qLYDfIEhiFctmE8WbHLuNzMRYYs1YrDGb4b3C +kfM1hOLiYCip1O7f9rKLRlVRanIyBQUX16XiqajkIWB23AfFrGd5uIVj9D44uGaQbWa 9i9pGMT1rlP+5FYnAhlAZ60vDtYGH5Zu9g1zC6d2oa0Bc1cxuYYfU0NW/WlXRDdywxtE G7ZQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz9g/vdcnvgpmkFEtgqgecHPq7LBqJH2uGm0F1vAwvtuXlYYzXM TdAvpr5fFpQLsfIbZ36ErhaVBKyDy/3supgF/UTFNDHaBsV9PgKP X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFmfdhzFdYadRY5ncu5e7aWYILCln59XeJiGBl8HA28U7oUP3rAr/gMxG3vytpkwJ3F4Q07Eg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5953:b0:a44:b90b:3262 with SMTP id g19-20020a170906595300b00a44b90b3262mr992688ejr.5.1709322042058; Fri, 01 Mar 2024 11:40:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from lumine.fritz.box (85-127-52-93.dsl.dynamic.surfer.at. [85.127.52.93]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p16-20020a170906229000b00a442979e5e5sm1963404eja.220.2024.03.01.11.40.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 01 Mar 2024 11:40:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: From: Liliana Marie Prikler Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2024 20:40:38 +0100 In-Reply-To: <878r31onwr.fsf@bayesians.ca> References: <878r31onwr.fsf@bayesians.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Scanner: mx10.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.80 X-Spam-Score: -1.80 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 9E49B76B4C X-TUID: yniiOpGsVIEp Am Freitag, dem 01.03.2024 um 17:35 +0000 schrieb Suhail: > Is my expectation that reordering entries in the load-path shouldn't > affect the natively-compiled status misplaced? Yes. We take the first prefix match and compute the file names from there. This is consistent with emacs matching the first file it finds on the load-path. You can't do much better, because your load path may only be partially specified at compile time and later expanded with normal-top-level-add-to-load-path. > Where in v10 it failed because 3 features previously reported as > being byte-compiled became natively-compiled, now it fails because > the same 3 features go from being natively-compiled to byte-compiled > after reordering load-path. The expectation that load-path order does not matter is imho quite unfounded. Note that we do ship the actually important test cases with v11. > A separate bug issue can be created to track the peculiar dependence > of the native-compilation status on the ordering of entries in load- > path. Well, to me it's not peculiar as I wrote the code, but I'm not sure how familiar you are with Emacs' internals. If you feel up for it, go for it, but I'd rather tackle other problems related to our emacs ecosystem. Anyway, as you said, I'm pushing this now so that we can do a double merge dance (i.e. master =E2=86=92 emacs-team, then request the other way) starting early tomorrow. Cheers