From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39856) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jL2fD-0008RI-By for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 06:38:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jL2fC-0004Jq-F5 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 06:38:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33703) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jL2fC-0004Jg-C5 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 06:38:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jL2fC-0001Fx-9X for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Apr 2020 06:38:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#40445] gnu: gsm: Update to 1.0.19. Resent-Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2020 10:37:13 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: "Raghav Gururajan" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87wo6ub4sz.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87wo6ub4sz.fsf@gmail.com> <87pncmcjuo.fsf@gmail.com> <87d08ms22w.fsf@gmail.com> <9fde0f2d6cf97a9368ae132a717cf18a@disroot.org> <06e6a1cfe8a54f80493a4e9f2820399b@disroot.org> <265df2102f5ed69aa35fc059dbb4d8e5@disroot.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Mathieu Othacehe Cc: 40445@debbugs.gnu.org > Yes that's what it does. But if in a future release this package update= s=0A> its CCFLAGS list in the Makefile, we will have to update our own pa= ckage=0A> definition accordingly. That's why adding 'CCFLAGS +=3D -fPIC' = somewhere=0A> seems safer to me.=0A=0AAh, gotcha! Hmm, I don't know how t= o do that through. I'll have to look into code base for examples.=0A=0ARe= gards,=0ARG.