From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 2EW1Ex5xS2DEbQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 13:48:14 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id 0K6ZDx5xS2CzbAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 13:48:14 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7D331CF6F for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:48:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:39274 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKi9E-00088C-TC for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 08:48:12 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42208) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKi94-000881-KS for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 08:48:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44750) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKi94-0008Cu-Cz for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 08:48:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lKi94-00087y-9H for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 08:48:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#47086] [PATCH] gnu: tig: Update to 2.5.3. Resent-From: "jgart" Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 13:48:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47086 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: "zimoun" , 47086@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 47086-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47086.161555685431206 (code B ref 47086); Fri, 12 Mar 2021 13:48:02 +0000 Received: (at 47086) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Mar 2021 13:47:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56296 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lKi8b-00087G-Lp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 08:47:34 -0500 Received: from mx1.dismail.de ([78.46.223.134]:26284) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lKi8X-000870-I1 for 47086@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 08:47:31 -0500 Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id a91b57db; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:47:22 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h= mime-version:date:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:from :message-id:subject:to:in-reply-to:references; s=20190914; bh=4J JszXTo+I6YqkjkaM84jRmDzYMLHit8M7ZvossTqLU=; b=ryGcDgS0jmuh7qDwOn G6DpEIL1MeTBRHuLwu+uW8hVt0yZLWjo+nc11BeANB8Jsb8JXWXgisDH1/a/OPHo 9DOFhnAZT+PaCgBaNKzd/wpj2hROH9Pc5GO1yOXFHa+ddxcMUIvgg6o/cbygzZNg bQxhCbgacOmEYMmJekx+wMYzAD20acWl5ATyfsagn7uY34pR225wkoSQwxQlYmSC a1E8RER2IIdZRQBS8N+0QmY4bxmdmxp1DG/7W5beChqmctd89JBKkpBi/bjRbiLc 0P2BWNG0AJ3JRnjvcBgPAUUnHDe8326Ltt8hK6391v/SndTRdMaE+ZC3twaHdNrS Tv/w== Received: from smtp2.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.12]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 63078d62; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:47:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 373b40e4; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:47:22 +0100 (CET) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id bc579785 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:47:21 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 13:47:20 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: RainLoop/1.14.0a Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <86czw4imk5.fsf@gmail.com> References: <86czw4imk5.fsf@gmail.com> <86y2esivr1.fsf@gmail.com> <125a0693a18af4886dc4cc76f2af982e@dismail.de> <1a2e15a36aa4757e49a1f175c7cf014f@dismail.de> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" Reply-to: jgart X-ACL-Warn: , jgart via Guix-patches From: jgart via Guix-patches via X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1615556894; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=4JJszXTo+I6YqkjkaM84jRmDzYMLHit8M7ZvossTqLU=; b=PjgGtK7n1Kfb9IFlu0yt0pM97nHvkY7NWSUuWBiiycbnxXAKcGD48RlrssZ3CgWvDkpJi6 J+Gdn4goW76BR6pceQeojG36F+1v3Hy1uFikop/s43q3K/dSt0jjKTr0r0nVItgaZ52MQt 9Oi5AbfWpX1fpWiY1+R2/5VTK6qk7Xi1MW5IqwHoddCw5m7PEqIt8Ep/CHO6ClRjtfBEsG VITtJWNQn4Np8xKo9KH2elGrl/EhY99FVJ3mHLZ1DYYZt0S73oJnPQZLOCwbqvcXYhOvrl voURGzAN7GNjWYGHfc9j9WoDSf5e9Cq0B+8Pc9Y4M+JSHwhiUhR60VAYhf0PpA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1615556894; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=W6F0lo+zYOmwKq4QTNEP/x72ygp5gxNLHQzYd5Xw2ppbI3L9V/c0Xpg9MIH1oW9GLYxKne Tfe5nubBHWW65OmziajWsZTtF3lGhwP5VWZGBIfY9+SO+mfaX1GgWDtYKz/sN+w5y6szHs f4gsD/2pbeHmjml5Gyzlv74dOdWKudVyMuqMJxvY8TLDhbX2GCSnXXukByGeD5Jffd/c7V 9VzrDrdShvaOTAm3CFqxjD9GalYxqu+IqPBjYJwM21GLC8bgObVPGFvFEG85YfWBMhAWc7 wIdiJgGG1/eDUKlsqsq9jKyUTy93rDd28HUinyuxLnW+OuQ8IHiFSeCcmNdlXg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=dismail.de header.s=20190914 header.b=ryGcDgS0; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.89 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=dismail.de header.s=20190914 header.b=ryGcDgS0; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: B7D331CF6F X-Spam-Score: -2.89 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: jtXSrFN3On+h Hi zimoun,=0A=0AThank you for your interest.=0A=0A> I still think it is a= bad idea that LibreMiami holds the Copyright instead of people who effec= tively did the=0A> work. That=E2=80=99s my point of view.=0A=0AI respect = your point of view. We attribute everyone involved in the packaging effor= t during any given packaging session.=0A=0AWe include a "Co-authored-by: = ..." tag in all the commit messages for those involved.=0A=0AAll parties = involved are aware of this and also decide whether they want to be includ= ed in the commit message or not. Some also prefer anonymity and no copyri= ght claim. We even have a pre-meetup questionnaire that helps facilitate = this. =0A=0AIf you come to one of our meetups and prefer to add your own = copyright to the top of the file instead of adding it as a group that is = fine by us also. We have a field in the pre-meetup questionnaire where pe= ople can indicate what they prefer. =0A=0AWhen I work on a contribution a= lone I commit with my own name but when I work with LibreMiami I prefer t= o commit under that entity and include the "Co-authored-by" tag. =0A=0AWe= prefer to commit/work together as a group and that is a convenience for = us. LibreMiami just wants to act as a steward of free software and we see= guix packaging as a way of realizing that common goal. We'd like to onbo= ard as many guix packagers as possible. We believe persons from all walks= of life can update and package software given a bit of practice and orie= ntation. Guix's transparency as a community/technology is a perfect vehic= al for this cause. =0A=0AI hope this clarified things. Feel free to ask m= ore questions and/or chat with us at libremiami:matrix.org.=0A=0AThere is= also an xmpp bridge if you prefer xmpp: #libremiami#matrix.org@matrix.or= g=0A=0A> This is really cool! Great initiative. Maybe I will show up. :-)= =0A=0AThank you! Yes, stop by. We'd love to have you. I will be announcin= g the next guix packaging meetup soon on guix-devel.=0A=0A> If I read cor= rectly, this commit a2ece4 does not lead to a Copyright=0A> assignment. S= o it=E2=80=99s fine. Even, I find really cool that 6 people=0A> co-author= ed a patch during a meetup.=0A=0AI think it is cool also.=0A=0Aall the be= st,=0A=0Ajgart=0A=0Alibremiami.org=0Asearch.libremiami.org=0Amumble.libre= miami.org=0Astream.libremiami.org=0A=0AMarch 12, 2021 7:32 AM, "zimoun" <= zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> wrote:=0A=0A> Hi,=0A> =0A> On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 = at 11:42, "jgart" wrote:=0A> =0A>>> Is LibreMiami a pe= rson or a =C2=ABjuridical person=C2=BB?=0A>> =0A>> Yes, LibreMiami is a j= uridical person. We are a legal entity that=0A>> commits and works on pac= kaging software together.=0A> =0A> Thanks for the clarification. I still = think it is a bad idea that=0A> LibreMiami holds the Copyright instead of= people who effectively did the=0A> work. That=E2=80=99s my point of view= .=0A> =0A>>> It is also the case for 387cac30bc4161055aba0c51e798a440f445= 92c2 adding=0A>>> the package =E2=80=99t=E2=80=99 (then renamed) and ...= =0A>> =0A>> #46969 and go-github-com-operatorfoundation-ed25519=0A>> (a2e= ce4da1fdccb9e94681e38a3f3a79b0d43e061) are other examples too.=0A> =0A> I= f I read correctly, this commit a2ece4 does not lead to a Copyright=0A> a= ssignment. So it=E2=80=99s fine. Even, I find really cool that 6 people= =0A> co-authored a patch during a meetup.=0A> =0A>> We host a package mee= tup every month. If you're available, we'd love=0A>> to meet you and work= on something together, also.=0A> =0A> This is really cool! Great initiat= ive. Maybe I will show up. :-)=0A> =0A> My point is just about the holder= of the Copyright. Concretely, to be=0A> correct legally speaking, IIUC, = the co-authors (of the 2 commits and=0A> this patch) signed a copyright t= ransfer to the LibreMiami entity.=0A> Otherwise, the copyright does not b= elong to LibreMiami.=0A> =0A> Cheers,=0A> simon