On 08.01.19 11:05, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
> Agreed, the win is not always obvious.
> If we are all OK with this, let's close the issue.
> 
> Tim, what do you think?
> 

That's no problem for me.
After all my intent was to make sure I don't have clangs source tree 3
times in the store :)
I think we should still put the generic function into llvm.scm and not
the clang specific one.