From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52235) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hf2Pb-0003Bb-9P for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 09:20:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hf2Pa-0002cP-Af for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 09:20:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39535) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hf2Pa-0002bO-4O for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 09:20:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hf2PZ-0005y3-Rq for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 09:20:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#36258] [PATCH 1/2] gnu: monero: Update to 0.14.1.0. Resent-Message-ID: References: <20190617084436.12311-1-glv@posteo.net> <49b66acb-c2f9-5fd0-97aa-16711ae933e1@riseup.net> <87imsx2rk3.fsf@yamatai> <87blyobgzl.fsf@yamatai> From: swedebugia Message-ID: Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2019 15:18:53 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87blyobgzl.fsf@yamatai> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Guillaume LE VAILLANT Cc: 36258@debbugs.gnu.org On 2019-06-23 14:53, Guillaume LE VAILLANT wrote: > > swedebugia a écrit : ... >> Could not find executable >> /tmp/guix-build-monero-0.14.1.0.drv-0/build/tests/hash-target-tests > > That's strange, if the compilation phase finished, the > 'build/tests/hash-target-tests' file should exist. > Do the 'build/tests/core_tests/core_tests' and > 'build/tests/unit_tests/unit_tests' programs exist, or is your > 'build/tests' directory empty? It did exist but the drv-paths in the makefiles was wrong. > > Also, 'core_tests' takes a long time to complete (around 40 minutes on > my machine I think), and it doesn't print any message while it's > running (but there should be 1 CPU core in use). > Got them running now. Will report back when they are done :) -- Cheers Swedebugia