On 22/04/2020 17:38, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > This v2 looks alright to me, but I got this test failure on x86_64: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > Start 13: HardwareUnitTests > 13/52 Test #13: HardwareUnitTests ...................***Failed 0.04 sec > [==========] Running 5 tests from 2 test cases. > [----------] Global test environment set-up. > [----------] 1 test from CpuInfoTest > [ RUN ] CpuInfoTest.SupportLevel > [ OK ] CpuInfoTest.SupportLevel (0 ms) > [----------] 1 test from CpuInfoTest (0 ms total) > > [----------] 4 tests from HardwareTopologyTest > [ RUN ] HardwareTopologyTest.Execute > [ OK ] HardwareTopologyTest.Execute (6 ms) > [ RUN ] HardwareTopologyTest.HwlocExecute > /tmp/guix-build-gromacs-2020.1.drv-0/gromacs-2020.1/src/gromacs/hardware/tests/hardwaretopology.cpp:88: Failure > Expected: (hwTop.supportLevel()) >= (gmx::HardwareTopology::SupportLevel::Basic), actual: 4-byte object <01-00 00-00> vs 4-byte object <02-00 00-00> > Cannot determine basic hardware topology from hwloc. GROMACS will still > > work, but it might affect your performance for large nodes. > Please mail gmx-developers@gromacs.org so we can try to fix it. > [ FAILED ] HardwareTopologyTest.HwlocExecute (5 ms) > [ RUN ] HardwareTopologyTest.ProcessorSelfconsistency > [ OK ] HardwareTopologyTest.ProcessorSelfconsistency (6 ms) > [ RUN ] HardwareTopologyTest.NumaCacheSelfconsistency > [ OK ] HardwareTopologyTest.NumaCacheSelfconsistency (5 ms) > [----------] 4 tests from HardwareTopologyTest (22 ms total) > > [----------] Global test environment tear-down > [==========] 5 tests from 2 test cases ran. (22 ms total) > [ PASSED ] 4 tests. > [ FAILED ] 1 test, listed below: > [ FAILED ] HardwareTopologyTest.HwlocExecute > > 1 FAILED TEST > > […] > > The following tests FAILED: > 13 - HardwareUnitTests (Failed) > Errors while running CTest > make: *** [Makefile:99: test] Error 8 > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > Could you check what the test is doing? I think it tries to get CPU topology from the linux kernel, which is not particularly useful to test on a build server, the package may run on completely different hardware. > It may be reasonable to just skip it. Hope you don't mind trading a test suite failure for a (harmless) test suite build warning... How's the crude disabling in the attached patch v3 look to you ? And does it fix the failure ? This test is not failing here (kvm on ryzen). -- Vincent Legoll