From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:1008:1e59::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id aPvRGupWmGV3PgEAkFu2QA (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 20:22:18 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id gBDXFepWmGUvCQAA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 20:22:18 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1704482538; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=uMnks9+4Ukhft0eE9qMzCnIYxtgXD1F7EPwBt9JtKhY=; b=rrjH7DROp8HaIh7nrTtarH9VQEtknxwZU0gA6VKYfhuezkS0MKgysdaz5T9a2SFX7+AmL3 UxAJ501lsA/oDz3DJ4eLHIjYMPIIhnSANeThoM1iPj0cnVkRioInIzFIh65cvyV4kijxaA d9bd2OJD6Fzs8/sITPYvP2Bf/llnz6O8PBJTfIMyx1/XF4PR7ELzWJgrNV3XR7v52tNaKd /GtMBHT/Oj9qlkrDXFLQR37DKMi8WFeR9FCsMkaGBY48GG8sGGWM/ql5uie4G8RpSRY4Pz b2Nc2JX/4AFDsscQKPX3sJRPB2O/y/r14NoL45mddAKlDXFcFg52iCux4zRWOQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1704482538; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=QO0JfC4GQKGm1XTSHSmamVHooy1fECUSBkhTaRxFpqJewLLMmE8HKKOqVvK6cIPCQN0FPs MFwTT0c+dwee91rEC6Xl2k0YLIoDIubAgGRcX41YCbTzCpVaLcpVh/qhpWEd8Cag8zjMYB WvDNV2MUuajHHmHihPk0T6r+f+PTW7R0deKveJ5HWQHUyQ7YsTlRxiYI8FZW9rqAW167mc +LMwwYVOMQ0hc44YeEETKQhFNBBBNxc6QtfH8uNl3RveqSI18hbsLCbqtr+RRqYUd0FiKG lKDhlhCLlnuPBKA3dl1s9apiaIUHTv9FU7l5LJGX9bIM8jh0Zq157YOBY3gijg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F02FD41CA9 for ; Fri, 5 Jan 2024 20:22:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rLplY-00080C-N2; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 14:22:00 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rLplW-0007zx-EI for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 14:21:58 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rLplW-0003bj-6E for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 14:21:58 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rLpla-00033m-95 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 14:22:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#61064] acknowledged by developer (control message for bug #61064) Resent-From: Jack Hill Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2024 19:22:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61064 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 61064@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: Maxim Cournoyer Received: via spool by 61064-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B61064.170448247311693 (code B ref 61064); Fri, 05 Jan 2024 19:22:02 +0000 Received: (at 61064) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jan 2024 19:21:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57948 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rLpkm-00032X-KK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 14:21:13 -0500 Received: from minsky.hcoop.net ([104.248.1.95]:54350) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rLpkh-00031z-O3 for 61064@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 14:21:11 -0500 Received: from 071-069-176-211.res.spectrum.com ([71.69.176.211] helo=[172.31.7.167]) by minsky.hcoop.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rLpkX-0008Qt-Gm; Fri, 05 Jan 2024 14:20:57 -0500 Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 14:20:56 -0500 (EST) From: Jack Hill In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <87a5pj1wq5.fsf@gmail.com> <20230125185518.12652-1-jackhill@jackhill.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -6.27 X-Spam-Score: -6.27 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: F02FD41CA9 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx11.migadu.com X-TUID: VNiec9S2bnrM On Fri, 5 Jan 2024, GNU bug Tracking System wrote: > This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report > #61064: [PATCH] gnu: gnutls: Update to 3.7.8., > which was filed against the guix-patches package. > > Thank you for your report, which has now been closed. > You can view the full report at > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=61064 > > If you require further information, please followup to 61064@debbugs.gnu.org. Hi Maxim, Thanks for taking the time to clean up some old issues. However, Can you say a little bit more about what the thinking is on this one? I notice that we still have some packages (e.g. dino via glib-networking) that are still on gnutls-3.7. Is the idea tha it would be better to switch those over to 3.8 than update 3.7? Thanks! Jack