Hi Maxim!

> As I've answered on IRC, so far, the (gnu packgaes cpp) module seems
> sufficient; it's a relatively small module itself.  The problem I see
> with having codesynthesis as a module is that it'd be misleading as a
> module name: not all their tools are about code synthesis (that's their
> company name, but that's not obvious!  I got confused that way when
> first looking at your patch series).

Agreed.

> I've merged the codesynthesis packgaes in the cpp module already; if it
> becomes a problem we can revisit this choice.

Sounds good.

Regards,
RG.