From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id OIefCpkkKF9CRAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 14:52:09 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id mPyMBpkkKF+0bgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 14:52:09 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A0279404E2 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 14:52:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:50192 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k2bos-0004wo-BC for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 10:52:06 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44254) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k2boo-0004wJ-Dk for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 10:52:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34278) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k2boo-0007RY-5F for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 10:52:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k2bon-0001Xg-UX for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 10:52:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#42680] Fwd: Re: bug#42694: 26.3; Emacs crashes when linked against newer libx11 In-Reply-To: <20200802184655.30348-1-leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at> Resent-From: Leo Prikler Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2020 14:52:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42680 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 42680@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 42680-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B42680.15964662845875 (code B ref 42680); Mon, 03 Aug 2020 14:52:01 +0000 Received: (at 42680) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Aug 2020 14:51:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45824 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k2boC-0001Wg-CA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 10:51:24 -0400 Received: from mailrelay.tugraz.at ([129.27.2.202]:36345) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k2bo7-0001WS-Bt for 42680@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 10:51:23 -0400 Received: from nijino.local (213-147-177-210.hdsl.highway.telekom.at [213.147.177.210]) by mailrelay.tugraz.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4BL16W3s8Hz1LLyX for <42680@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 16:51:14 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mailrelay.tugraz.at 4BL16W3s8Hz1LLyX DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tugraz.at; s=mailrelay; t=1596466275; bh=wgng/29Bh0r9U/WH5diuadu2DRAznw15MI5PrvNJEJg=; h=Subject:From:To:Date:References:From; b=ejHAFC4+Zu0Q9WJfPWPKXvMR+vFJPyM7FabcRQ+UFD3/siT/9K26iKsQyABOgdX4k lyYxVIbsii7TKoPmuXQaY/twJwcngF1NjEUIgGnXmIueZ8DDZ++fzUzOE4ANgcIIbH PIExoQt6ijAcOpd1kbFBvcR2573w3F4NZgZq7tC0= Message-ID: From: Leo Prikler Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2020 16:51:14 +0200 References: <837dufbxna.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-PUcFpuaRvji1pK2vCQ6K" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TUG-Backscatter-control: bt4lQm5Tva3SBgCuw0EnZw X-Spam-Scanner: SpamAssassin 3.003001 X-Spam-Score-relay: -1.9 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 on 129.27.10.117 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (body hash did not verify) header.d=tugraz.at header.s=mailrelay header.b=ejHAFC4+; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=student.tugraz.at (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.09 X-TUID: /leYQGWPR0/U --=-PUcFpuaRvji1pK2vCQ6K Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit It turns out, that this bug got fixed upstream independently using a slightly different patch. --=-PUcFpuaRvji1pK2vCQ6K Content-Disposition: inline Content-Description: Weitergeleitete Nachricht =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=93?= Re: bug#42694: 26.3; Emacs crashes when linked against newer libx11 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Return-Path: Received: from mail.sbox.tugraz.at ([unix socket]) by sbox.tugraz.at (Cyrus 2.5.12-TUGraz) with LMTPA; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 16:41:00 +0200 X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.4 Received: from mxesa2.tugraz.at (mailgate.tugraz.at [129.27.2.197]) by mail.sbox.tugraz.at (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7857D1A0F82 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 16:41:00 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: mxesa2.tugraz.at; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none IronPort-SDR: WV16fBi2y7Ra4ITOLp1O/z7BuTiGa0h6c4Se9zNjrwwGEBnT8WbMY9zWBCkRKxPh4be3LaV2u7 VXUhNxVl18llYpvcsu/NgU0Qec1U025vFZ2c++NzzABojnTqY1xgqVm5dvi8QG1Lk+vMvZVL3I sPFHOph/q6TVEpe5xs6AhMGz1/CLI14IhenXHisGWbXg0VYJ5jwQlNKqnn7y6IwYoaUcYTJZ7i 62riKkPqVBhxLbN9VI/x7flGGTIJVbPZ0iLN4RR8PtV+EbfJUWTohuDta+D2psAu1tGn6mJJ/t GwkcrROdmN4JsFhdbw1nBN85 X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0GOBQCLIShfe1y8M9FgH4QGUYFMMSyVToECmwwLAQECA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEILAECBAEBhEwCgjsCJDgTAgMBAQEDAgMBAQEBAQQBAQECAQEFAgEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?gIQAQGBBWBbgUeBcgYEPIZKAQEBAQIBeQULCxQBDCUPAUcGE4YDIAEDAbEtg?= =?us-ascii?q?iiFU4NHgUCBOI0OGoFBP4ERglsHLj6KMwSbW5ozgmuBDY4ViwiRUY4psXKBa?= =?us-ascii?q?iGBWk0wCIMkTQECAQIBDAECAgECAQICCAEBApxmPzICNQIGCAEBAwlZAQEhj?= =?us-ascii?q?1IBAQ?= IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3Azoin7h2ZoJEc0x7ksmDT+zVfTzU7u7jyIg8e44?= =?us-ascii?q?YmjLQLSKm44pD+JxKFt/B9gUTAB8PH9v1egviQuryzEWAD4JPUtncEfdQMUh?= =?us-ascii?q?IekswZkkQmB9LNEkz0KvPmLmQ6Ec1OWUUj/iS9Nk5YFQ=3D=3D?= X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,430,1589234400"; d="scan'208";a="31802088" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False X-TUGAntiSpamFlag: ham X-MGA-submission: =?us-ascii?q?MDGyfxEpnPaYza7keMUtsnlvCO0owBWuxjOxLp?= =?us-ascii?q?WTcMXH8DZttbXlZI/19V5IJ3FNLQSnCUwmt+jN0MD34ZWuukeDgmydbG?= =?us-ascii?q?EYsdR07SRwHeZYHseo2MBruquD6kHKVa9Uw9AgaMjD05cQvaM+ijTCX/?= =?us-ascii?q?hK?= Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]) by mxesa2.tugraz.at with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256; 03 Aug 2020 16:40:59 +0200 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42986) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k2be3-0005uu-6Z; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 10:40:55 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3597 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1k2be2-0006rR-KX; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 10:40:54 -0400 Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2020 17:40:41 +0300 Message-Id: <837dufbxna.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Leo Prikler Cc: 42694@debbugs.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <66a57c1d0278d1e1117d2a81097635bfd63a9ebd.camel@student.tugraz.at> (message from Leo Prikler on Mon, 03 Aug 2020 11:31:49 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#42694: 26.3; Emacs crashes when linked against newer libx11 References: <66a57c1d0278d1e1117d2a81097635bfd63a9ebd.camel@student.tugraz.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > From: Leo Prikler > Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2020 11:31:49 +0200 >=20 > Two days ago, a patch was sent to Guix updating libx11 to a newer > version in order to fix CVE-2020-14344. This causes a segmentation > fault in Emacs when trying to start an X window. After invoking GDB, I > found the offending line to be: >=20 > /* Determine XIC style */ > xic_style =3D best_xim_style (FRAME_X_XIM_STYLES (f)); >=20 > For some reason, FRAME_X_XIM_STYLES (f) returns NULL here and > best_xim_style fails when ARRAYELTS is called on it. I've attached a > patch, that checks for this case. Thanks, this is bug#42676, which was solved yesterday. --=-PUcFpuaRvji1pK2vCQ6K--