From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41434) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQ87H-0003BQ-Hl for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 07:28:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQ87G-0002n1-Fx for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 07:28:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60856) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQ87G-0002mX-3c for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 07:28:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jQ87F-0001KY-W2 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 07:28:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#40646] gnu: Add blueman. Resent-Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 11:27:31 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: "Raghav Gururajan" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87mu773ekd.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87mu773ekd.fsf@gnu.org> <20200415135234.3bd638ea.raghavgururajan@disroot.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 40646@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Ludo!=0A=0A>> + (substitute* "apps/blueman-adapters.in"=0A>> + (("@PYT= HON@") (string-append (assoc-ref inputs "python")=0A>> + "/bin/python3.7"= )))=0A> =0A> Are you sure this is necessary? If these are scripts, the=0A= > =E2=80=98patch-shebangs=E2=80=99 phase should take care of it. Perhaps = it=E2=80=99s enough to=0A> add =E2=80=98python-wrapper=E2=80=99 as an inp= ut (it provides a =E2=80=9Cpython=E2=80=9D executable) and=0A> then you c= an remove all this?=0A=0AIt is not necessary. Those scripts were not patc= hed by 'patch-shebangs' phase, and received warnings during build. So cor= rected them manually. :-)=0A=0ARegards,=0ARG.