From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37501)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dwma1-0004U3-AK
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 05:55:06 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dwmZy-0006cv-Og
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 05:55:05 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51035)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1dwmZy-0006co-KU
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 05:55:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dwmZy-00071K-E9
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 05:55:02 -0400
Subject: [bug#27922] [PATCH] gnu: python-numpy: Update to 1.12.1.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.27922.B27922.150641966726939@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Thomas Danckaert <post@thomasdanckaert.be>
References: <ae321749739c8fcd7297b70ac52a3aa1cd9028a6.1501703340.git.leo@famulari.name>
	<87d18dwwyi.fsf@fastmail.com> <20170802224834.GE14798@jasmine.lan>
	<87vaky1u0m.fsf@gnu.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 11:53:55 +0200
In-Reply-To: <87vaky1u0m.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\=
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Mon, 04 Sep 2017 15:19:05 +0200")
Message-ID: <cuca81h4wgc.fsf@thomasdanckaert.be>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: 27922@debbugs.gnu.org

ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes:

> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 10:12:21PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote:
>>> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:
>>>=20
>>> > * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-numpy, python2-numpy): Update to 1.=
12.1.
>>>=20
>>> LGTM ;-)
>>>=20
>>> > [source]: Download the "real" release tarball instead of the snapshot.
>>>=20
>>> NumPy provides a PGP signature with the zipball on PyPi:
>>>=20
>>> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/numpy
>>
>> Good catch!
>>
>>> Is there a reason to prefer the GitHub release tarball?
>>
>> Not that I know of. I only chose this tarball because I saw it on the Gi=
tHub
>> page. I'll try switching to PyPi.
>
> Leo, I think this fell through the cracks!  :-)
>
> Ludo'.

I can push a modified patch (with the pypi source) if it's ok.  Is there
any reason we would not update to version 1.13.1 rightaway?

Thomas