From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55071) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHG7J-0006KR-Ex for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 16:30:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHG7G-00007J-Bl for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 16:30:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:42837) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHG7G-00007C-8r for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 16:30:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eHG7F-0005EH-RX for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Nov 2017 16:30:01 -0500 Subject: [bug#29386] Update taglib to 1.11.1. Resent-Message-ID: References: <8760a3qq7p.fsf@fastmail.com> From: Pierre Langlois In-reply-to: <8760a3qq7p.fsf@fastmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 21:29:08 +0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Marius Bakke Cc: 29386-done@debbugs.gnu.org Marius Bakke writes: > Pierre Langlois writes: > >> Hello Guix! >> >> This is a patch to update taglib. I've had to enable building >> as a >> shared library otherwise gst-plugins-good would fail to >> link. Also, >> `guix lint' warned about the home page redirecting to >> http://taglib.org >> so I thought I'd fix that too. > > Hello Pierre, > > Thank you for this patch, and for checking dependent packages! > I've > applied it after fixing a typo in the commit message (home > page). > >> Finally, I tried to enable the tests by adding "-DBUILD_TESTS" >> as a >> configure flag but they are explicitely disabled if building >> the shared >> library: >> ~~~ >> if(BUILD_TESTS AND NOT BUILD_SHARED_LIBS) >> enable_testing() >> add_subdirectory(tests) >> endif() >> ~~~ >> >> Oh well, how does this look? > > OK! Perhaps we could do a separate build just for the tests, > but that > should be in a standalone patch anyway. > > Pushed as d1451fa0d0b27a20ef3a1b3fe8d53a995f0c4d85. That was quick! Thank you! Pierre