From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38249) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fEHAH-0006Ku-VZ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 03 May 2018 12:33:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fEHAE-0006d7-A2 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 03 May 2018 12:33:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:40527) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fEHAE-0006d1-4G for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 03 May 2018 12:33:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fEHAD-0006gF-UQ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 03 May 2018 12:33:01 -0400 Subject: bug#31018: [PATCHv2] Improvements for our Emacs build system and fixes. Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: From: Arun Isaac In-Reply-To: References: <87y3i6538o.fsf@gmail.com> <9925e912.AM4AAAS8QCUAAAAAAAAAAAPHPfsAAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABa0jGH@mailjet.com> <87d0yyo7vm.fsf_-_@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 03 May 2018 22:02:46 +0530 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Maxim Cournoyer Cc: 31018-done@debbugs.gnu.org Arun Isaac writes: > Should emacs-scel only be a native input, or should it be a propagated input? I made emacs-scel a propagated input, and pushed all commits as discussed. Thanks!