From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37713) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ibNDv-0001dM-FA for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 06:17:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ibNDt-0000Ec-Ee for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 06:17:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57798) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ibNDq-0000CO-EV for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 06:17:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ibNDq-0003Cx-Af for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 06:17:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#38211] [PATCH 0/9] Update Jami to 20111101 Resent-Message-ID: From: Arun Isaac In-Reply-To: <87y2vxnnep.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> References: <20191114180422.5592-1-mail@ambrevar.xyz> <87y2vxnnep.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2019 16:46:26 +0530 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Pierre Neidhardt Cc: 38211@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain > You should start ring with ring.cx, _not_ gnome-ring. > > If it still does not work, try launching dring: > > /gnu/store/v9scpdy0zip94gsfl75zlw1alvgi6xkq-libring-20190319.4.a16a99f/lib/ring/dring -dcp It works for me now, but only after launching dring manually like you said. Running ring.cx without starting dring failed. Thank you very much for your work on jami! :-) Jami is of great importance to the decentralized internet, and it's nice to have it in Guix. > Now if it works for you I really wonder what's wrong with the GUI on > my end... This is strange, but I think someone who actually understands dconf and dbus should comment on this. I'm sorry, I don't know enough. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEf3MDQ/Lwnzx3v3nTLiXui2GAK7MFAl3joQsACgkQLiXui2GA K7OgFwf/RS62oOxXE44EKuzrYx2kU1hCCgxvsPoApBrUQcXQRHOpibML2otWj+lf sr1GJHf0OG+RhQZOxzWrpJNq9pINMS2GZtjuNQHoUy/oK+4sDK4jTMMQAKZdkJ07 ig2aMi7h2WdR4xn9xDtvf8J2N1GsGMLdGBfV/Oa1hX6INVGj9oJcate6s4GjFUwQ oF8sy6ptjVA70Wof/wVW2SsQmHuSmtWmiJerWO5HDamT76GgBdFbpsz8s9NUlaQe kYsVMw2b7hrI3AwL3rdFcq0EVljca2SGn1sNYS7i248ozqFDEWM18tWxc/hCg65z ddn3auNNIA3LupPgmMGxGa4as25OrA== =Qlxu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--