From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54054) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ikTMy-0002Mu-3R for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 08:40:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ikTMx-0003TH-22 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 08:40:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49063) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ikTMw-0003TA-5J for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 08:40:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ikTMw-0000P5-1e for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 08:40:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#38149] [WIP] gnu: Add qgis. Resent-Message-ID: From: Arun Isaac In-Reply-To: <20191223075502.3d9cd692@scratchpost.org> References: <20191109112702.14723-1-wz@freeshell.de> <20191218100751.6edc13ce@alma-ubu> <20191223075502.3d9cd692@scratchpost.org> Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2019 19:09:11 +0530 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Danny Milosavljevic Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_?= =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=B6fling?= , 38149@debbugs.gnu.org, Wiktor =?UTF-8?Q?=C5=BBelazny?= --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain >> Also, we should push some of the simpler patches (say, the simple >> update patches) to master right away. That will help to declutter >> this bug report a little bit. WDYT? > > Sure. I have pushed the patches regarding geos, proj, libgeotiff, gdal, postgis and libspatialindex. > Also, I think the licenses can be added right now. I am not sure of the licenses of qgis. They need to be double checked. So, I think we should wait until then to push those license patches. > Likewise the package updates, but probably not the python 2.7 > modification, especially if python 3 also inherits it. > The latter should go to some other branch. That's right. The python modification would trigger too many rebuilds. Do you know which branch I should push it to? > What's up with libgeotiff's disabled tests? That was a WIP patch where the tests were failing. In the patch I pushed, I fixed the tests and enabled them. > Also, I think we usually don't list the license of non-installed files > (like the cmake includes). Ok, I made this modification before pushing the patches. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEf3MDQ/Lwnzx3v3nTLiXui2GAK7MFAl4Et/8ACgkQLiXui2GA K7P/Nwf+J9O3uuDQlSVYQgRHEcNPLR2GYiF7ONsnjULtYnL5lRwsDcNIHkbHH98C yj2WKcSBbEEE9xk0Mf15Hzf1ddQSW2T5gYEJZPKxmIH+BL4QCLEUpcZhVZaX02HB kY+AM3oTqunm4P257BLMTtwFJGQAEhQeWLbe3ZcW6dfULirAHkN6twXEXa7FMHZf wo4LnIWUmjU6/iUeifdbjV/PDGmCB7FBC0haogiFoofUpxafmIRGhWiILGmS2RgF OWLImXZS6zh79YbyOTstsZBWV6Zio9gthRFHtNhyO6+7BW2hfS27vb8jXccX48sD 44Q254kVxbE+DTwOO4SbiHx5cCOsnQ== =to9t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--