From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54413) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fTuqJ-0002EY-6L for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 15:57:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fTuqE-0000as-BE for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 15:57:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:42781) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fTuqE-0000af-4r for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 15:57:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fTuqD-0001HR-Qs for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 15:57:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#31850] Acknowledgement ([PATCH] gnu: texlive-bin: Use absolute path to ghostscript executable "gs".) Resent-Message-ID: From: Arun Isaac In-Reply-To: References: <20180615192622.6416-1-arunisaac@systemreboot.net> Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2018 01:26:37 +0530 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: 31850@debbugs.gnu.org I seem to have made one of the lines way too long. I'll fix that before pushing, once someone has reviewed this patch. Also, should this patch go to core-updates considering that the texlive package is very tedious to build?