From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43614) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fzeHI-0006TT-O7 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 04:44:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fzeHC-0003SL-Iq for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 04:44:08 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60110) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fzeHB-0003Rl-Tq for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 04:44:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fzeHB-0006nN-Q1 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 04:44:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#32465] Add iptables service Resent-Message-ID: From: Arun Isaac In-Reply-To: <20180911085329.2c625c63@alma-ubu> References: <20180911085329.2c625c63@alma-ubu> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 14:13:03 +0530 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_?= =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=B6fling?= Cc: 32465@debbugs.gnu.org, Rutger Helling > I have no knowledge about the firewall tools, I have no idea of how > mature or accepted that is, I just thought it might be worth > considering instead of writing 3 services. I have heard of nftables, but I haven't yet learnt how to use it. So, for now, I'll just do 2 services (one for iptables, and another for ip6tables). I think someone else who understands nftables should write the nftables service.