From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34010) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f9DRe-00005J-Ji for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 13:34:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f9DRa-0008Ag-JE for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 13:34:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53491) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f9DRa-0008AV-Ey for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 13:34:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f9DRZ-0006B4-SV for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 13:34:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#31123] [PATCH 2/2] gnu: texlive-bin: Patch texlua shebangs. Resent-Message-ID: From: Arun Isaac In-Reply-To: <87muy2dctr.fsf@fastmail.com> References: <20180411060313.27912-1-arunisaac@systemreboot.net> <20180411060313.27912-2-arunisaac@systemreboot.net> <87muy2dctr.fsf@fastmail.com> Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 23:03:05 +0530 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Marius Bakke , 31123@debbugs.gnu.org > Would it suffice to only patch "out/bin" here? > > Also, what is the return value of (patch-source-shebangs)? If it's > anything other than #t, you know what to do. Apart from that LGTM. Thank you for the review! I'll check and address both the above before I push. But, considering the huge size (~ 2.2 GB) of the texlive-texmf source tarball, and how hard it is to build from source, should I push these patches to core-updates?