From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53389) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hj5HA-0005bz-0F for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2019 13:12:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hj5H9-0006Z2-2j for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2019 13:12:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43034) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hj5H8-0006Yg-8n for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2019 13:12:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hj5H8-0001KM-2a for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2019 13:12:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#36415] [PATCH] gnu: Add qlogo. Resent-Message-ID: From: Arun Isaac In-Reply-To: <878stgvmze.fsf@elephly.net> References: <20190628080358.14910-1-arunisaac@systemreboot.net> <878stgvmze.fsf@elephly.net> Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2019 22:41:10 +0530 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: 36415@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >> I don't know. I have never understood how reproducibility checking works >> in Guix. Shouldn't --rounds=3D2 cause `guix build' to error out if there >> is some non-determinism? > > Yes. > > This might be a regression. > > Build being reported as =E2=80=9Cin progress=E2=80=9D is a feature. It= =E2=80=99s used to > indicate remaining builds when more than one thing is being built. > > In this case, though, it seems like a bug. Ok. > To test for reproducibility in this case you may want to use =E2=80=9C--c= heck=E2=80=9D > after building the thing once. With `guix build --no-grafts --check qlogo', I get no error. I assume that means qlogo is reproducible. Without '--no-grafts', I just see a graft happening, qlogo is not rebuilt. Output without '--no-grafts' follows. The following graft will be made: /gnu/store/vamlyscnwndzmq66whrd71ww31jnrz7v-qlogo-0.92.drv applying 2 grafts for /gnu/store/vamlyscnwndzmq66whrd71ww31jnrz7v-qlogo-0.9= 2.drv... grafting '/gnu/store/hmnchnawfv8ngl4wh15ni3ychr5ccb9w-qlogo-0.92' -> '/gnu/= store/85lialf1aich7b51a77afj187qk32n7h-qlogo-0.92'... successfully built /gnu/store/vamlyscnwndzmq66whrd71ww31jnrz7v-qlogo-0.92.d= rv /gnu/store/85lialf1aich7b51a77afj187qk32n7h-qlogo-0.92 If there's nothing else, may I push qlogo to master? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEf3MDQ/Lwnzx3v3nTLiXui2GAK7MFAl0eMy4ACgkQLiXui2GA K7PnDgf/RqxgToDKStPDXRim8nsZXYhtxsgUK6ErarGj3vLVMukLOuldUPnFR8yL Q99wZwDP8aTbX5YeoPxlBv/c5BB0R4Yof2n5xUSVFA4d8MRVXRB4aRLoV/YGc+kR qdPeeECDdjLALgtqAjjQY8maMTZG7jlYFfMlTXYyRWBWkz4to+S0349cfwdHngig PHVqQbIIE+2KUt7el52GVAF241wbJo5kOy5uyhphkWEJlYmgbtdcAExSn0YD72n/ o0q2ArahQkxJ5ZQ2UQkBN/isWXJHm63nBp693sRHhFubPjmtAA8pClUv0l14PrEr 0x6y2ShxkXxERByfszc303Db+hVL+w== =d2bS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--