From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60862)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1fcl1N-0005lq-Iy
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 01:17:06 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1fcl1K-000362-AR
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 01:17:05 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:45060)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1fcl1K-00035s-25
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 01:17:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1fcl1J-0004y8-S8
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 01:17:01 -0400
Subject: [bug#32102] [PATCH] utils: Fix wrap-program filename generation.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.32102.B32102.153119980819078@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Arun Isaac <arunisaac@systemreboot.net>
In-Reply-To: <87r2kc8pm8.fsf@lassieur.org>
References: <20180709013103.26091-1-arunisaac@systemreboot.net>
	<87k1q4j1zk.fsf@lassieur.org> <cu7efgcn0pg.fsf@systemreboot.net>
	<87r2kc8pm8.fsf@lassieur.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 10:46:32 +0530
Message-ID: <cu7bmbfn00f.fsf@systemreboot.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur <clement@lassieur.org>
Cc: 32102@debbugs.gnu.org


> should WRAP (from python-build-system.scm) wrap files that already
> have a wrapper?  I think it shouldn't.

I agree with your analysis. How about I send a patch modifying WRAP
(from python-build-system) to only wrap non-hidden files (files whose
name do not begin with a dot) in bin and sbin?