From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42945) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fFFfF-0005G1-CN for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 06 May 2018 05:09:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fFFfC-0003mN-6i for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 06 May 2018 05:09:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:43074) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fFFfC-0003mH-2D for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 06 May 2018 05:09:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fFFfB-0005Bg-St for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 06 May 2018 05:09:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#31036] [PATCH] gnu: Add Emacs dumb-jump Resent-Message-ID: From: Arun Isaac In-Reply-To: <87h8nm54ge.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20180403023403.GA4430@sam> <29a411b7.AL4AAAOBQdEAAAAAAAAAAAO0oB8AAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABaw7s5@mailjet.com> <20180409150008.GA10060@sam> <70DDB0B3-87D6-441A-AF01-FF245C3B6C9A@gmail.com> <20180411025055.GA21656@sam> <20180412065009.GA7920@sam> <87h8nm54ge.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 06 May 2018 14:37:57 +0530 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Oleg Pykhalov Cc: 31036@debbugs.gnu.org Oleg Pykhalov writes: >> I have pushed both packages emacs-noflet and emacs-dumb-jump. > > Apologies for not finding this bug report before. We have duplicates of > =E2=80=98emacs-dumb-jump=E2=80=99 in Guix package collection, because I'v= e pushed 88 > Emacs related patches 3 days ago including =E2=80=98emacs-dumb-jump=E2=80= =99. Sorry for the collision too. But, it's not a big deal. This can be fixed easily. > I probably should remove my =E2=80=98emacs-dumb-jump=E2=80=99. Is it OK = for you? Sure, please go ahead and remove one of the duplicate packages. I believe the version I pushed is a little more complete with native-inputs and tests (though I couldn't get them working properly).