From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39983) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eKP6N-0006uu-P0 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 08:42:11 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eKP6K-0005ao-Mk for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 08:42:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:57199) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eKP6K-0005Zv-G4 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 08:42:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eKP6K-0000Gv-9u for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 08:42:04 -0500 Subject: bug#29392: [PATCH 00/11] Add scons build system Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: From: Arun Isaac In-Reply-To: <20171129212927.GA23853@jasmine.lan> References: <20171128170651.6136-1-arunisaac@systemreboot.net> <20171128213828.GB16214@jasmine.lan> <20171129212927.GA23853@jasmine.lan> Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 19:10:56 +0530 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Leo Famulari Cc: 29392-done@debbugs.gnu.org Leo Famulari writes: >> So, do I push with the "-g0" flag or without? > > Since it didn't seem to have an effect on the storage requirements > during building, I think you can push without. Done. I have pushed all the patches except the one changing the homepage of pingus to HTTPS. Their site appears to be down, and I didn't want to push the change without verifying one last time.