* bug#26502: [PATCH] gnu: racket: Update to 6.8. @ 2017-04-14 20:24 Arun Isaac 2017-04-15 16:55 ` Marius Bakke 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Arun Isaac @ 2017-04-14 20:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 26502 * gnu/packages/scheme.scm (racket): Update to 6.8. --- gnu/packages/scheme.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/scheme.scm b/gnu/packages/scheme.scm index 1ccf62586..f6aee005c 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/scheme.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/scheme.scm @@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ implementation techniques and as an expository tool.") (define-public racket (package (name "racket") - (version "6.6") + (version "6.8") (source (origin (method url-fetch) (uri (list (string-append "http://mirror.racket-lang.org/installers/" @@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ implementation techniques and as an expository tool.") version "/racket/racket-" version "-src-unix.tgz"))) (sha256 (base32 - "1kzdi1n6h6hmz8zd9k8r5a5yp2ryi4w3c2fjm1k6cqicn18cwaxz")))) + "1l9z1a0r5zydr50cklx9xjw3l0pwnf64i10xq7112fl1r89q3qgv")))) (build-system gnu-build-system) (arguments '(#:phases -- 2.12.2 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* bug#26502: [PATCH] gnu: racket: Update to 6.8. 2017-04-14 20:24 bug#26502: [PATCH] gnu: racket: Update to 6.8 Arun Isaac @ 2017-04-15 16:55 ` Marius Bakke 2017-04-15 21:23 ` Arun Isaac 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Marius Bakke @ 2017-04-15 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arun Isaac, 26502 [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 648 bytes --] Arun Isaac <arunisaac@systemreboot.net> writes: > * gnu/packages/scheme.scm (racket): Update to 6.8. > --- > gnu/packages/scheme.scm | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) LGTM. Trivial changes like these are generally OK to push without going through this list as outlined in HACKING. Just be mindful about the amount of rebuilds it will cause. If `guix refresh -l <package>` prints more than ~300 dependents, it should go through the "staging" or "core-updates" branch. See this thread for the branching strategy: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-10/msg00933.html Thanks a lot for your contributions! [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 487 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* bug#26502: [PATCH] gnu: racket: Update to 6.8. 2017-04-15 16:55 ` Marius Bakke @ 2017-04-15 21:23 ` Arun Isaac 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Arun Isaac @ 2017-04-15 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 26502-done Pushed! Marius Bakke writes: > LGTM. Trivial changes like these are generally OK to push without going > through this list as outlined in HACKING. > > Just be mindful about the amount of rebuilds it will cause. If `guix > refresh -l <package>` prints more than ~300 dependents, it should go > through the "staging" or "core-updates" branch. See this thread for the > branching strategy: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-10/msg00933.html Sure, will keep that in mind! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-04-15 21:24 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2017-04-14 20:24 bug#26502: [PATCH] gnu: racket: Update to 6.8 Arun Isaac 2017-04-15 16:55 ` Marius Bakke 2017-04-15 21:23 ` Arun Isaac
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).