El 31/07/24 a las 6:26, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) escribió: > Luis Felipe writes: >>> Could you, Luis, in a new version of the patch add an asterisk that >>> preserving likely will work but not always and we cannot guarantee this >>> yet? Cc to others for opinions. >> Sure. I'll wait for other's opinions to see how to rewrite that part. >> >> When I presented the proposal, Simon had suggested changing that >> particular part to "Get the same environment in the future" >> (https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2023-10/msg00137.html). Maybe >> that would be enough? > I had read the thread; but somehow missed Simon’s comment... Yes, if > that rewording makes Simon happy already, we can do that. > > However, writing “in the future“ (or just removing the word 50 from “50 > years later”) could lead to misconceptions. There are concrete bugs > hindering near-term reproducibility for some packages (e.g. those using > mercurial) [1]. > > Soo ... add an ugly asterisk saying “*currently only guaranteed for most > packages“? How about linking the asterisk to the blog post instead (https://guix.gnu.org/blog/2024/adventures-on-the-quest-for-long-term-reproducible-deployment/)?