From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id gFUhJ0NM6GDAbQAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 15:16:51 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id MEncIkNM6GCyFwAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 13:16:51 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1F3124E3B for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 15:16:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:52190 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m1qN7-0006w9-Uh for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 09:16:49 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34744) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m1qMN-0006Wq-4o for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 09:16:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46981) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m1qMM-00047J-SQ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 09:16:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m1qMM-0005qE-Ny for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 09:16:02 -0400 Subject: bug#49219: Acknowledgement ([PATCH]: Update emacs-telega.) Resent-From: Leo Prikler Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2021 13:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 49219 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Zhu Zihao , Giovanni Biscuolo Cc: 49219-done@debbugs.gnu.org Mail-Followup-To: 49219@debbugs.gnu.org, leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at, all_but_last@163.com Received: via spool by 49219-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D49219.162583656122432 (code D ref 49219); Fri, 09 Jul 2021 13:16:02 +0000 Received: (at 49219-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jul 2021 13:16:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58527 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m1qML-0005pj-Ga for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 09:16:01 -0400 Received: from mailrelay.tugraz.at ([129.27.2.202]:29275) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m1qMH-0005pT-R9 for 49219-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 09:15:59 -0400 Received: from [10.0.0.4] (80-121-26-175.adsl.highway.telekom.at [80.121.26.175]) by mailrelay.tugraz.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4GLtvZ09Z4z1LBRt; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 15:15:52 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mailrelay.tugraz.at 4GLtvZ09Z4z1LBRt DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tugraz.at; s=mailrelay; t=1625836554; bh=wsbpt2/OZZ0Y+WAb2svDRvmg6TWHag7qMc/q0wWHG/c=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=JchFH5g26GXBywYVKN32HFl8hRH2ug7rnGYegpYff8EJcrPjZONpRWEItVSXxCAOi TpKaJ0R6ddItlS0pOh8B9RIOTaGy2PigqA8EtHZKoyGaaNZ8B62XKhjZMWxeGyxwr9 kCzbBGmCCJIiRjRiC1c8Jxx6rUJZvJczaWqbpROo= Message-ID: From: Leo Prikler Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2021 15:15:32 +0200 In-Reply-To: <0fb80caedd384347c57b0a0feaae0afff2861b96.camel@student.tugraz.at> References: <86mtre8pgb.fsf@163.com> <86h7hm8oth.fsf@163.com> <86o8bsg40d.fsf@163.com> <87zguyut9i.fsf@xelera.eu> <86eec793k5.fsf@163.com> <0fb80caedd384347c57b0a0feaae0afff2861b96.camel@student.tugraz.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TUG-Backscatter-control: bt4lQm5Tva3SBgCuw0EnZw X-Spam-Scanner: SpamAssassin 3.003001 X-Spam-Score-relay: -1.9 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 on 129.27.10.116 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1625836611; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-to: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=wsbpt2/OZZ0Y+WAb2svDRvmg6TWHag7qMc/q0wWHG/c=; b=kpXECp711QIcLKzCrfmw0/SQ6rrK4hY7e+j/XtMyBLicOkBFTtQrz8L/lxdJ0M3F4LXl5W R179eAJXW5qHhlIRq7rvK39Fcja7biFGWhYKSgfiGfluxdKWkMwGMwuGQFIQsdapk80Tpv MUDC2qcLbFxpPvGsAzasKNxHLafOzQNEFvkY9cm8RqoPv7l12g7vjloYeHke3/Yvk5Iih/ Yg0dB59EowW6QHV08CE9k3P0TLdHColsXJQzEjdjLFLBVY5yapmRuPV4n3P7GPV72WsZSq zVQyAjlnHXaFU3qGuV3RW6O56pXVIj/w15SRAWJVN+A7LQ5aYYJy4ULzyVH2Kw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1625836611; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=lyqxcnBU5pfI2sCNiI2oTiAe8Xu8fYMcEyPAUIzssrE8lKBgqFU+f5YxZ1SwfI7m5worhl +8qcTe0XOLqHxfwELLhSS6pwuZrJok+hgerHG4hMH70aEKrixjPegzYnvlro5fVSBv03oa BPpc909jbUGXvEd2Dd9EC6Laxkw8LnHxih0kzDxJ8oI0rR0rDm0oWQ2YcEQgvX4EJdPia4 YYhAAYX0FdCLIlpdFIOrXx9aemEZhu28cvsiJEIf/eW44AOptZcka5aoSteu0DA2bUklt6 fIRujYIvrWf0Hy4wJzpP0ioaPMOHtANZEd8rOjAIDEOIBViMWmrGM1KzvA2Q7w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=tugraz.at header.s=mailrelay header.b=JchFH5g2; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=student.tugraz.at (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.30 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=tugraz.at header.s=mailrelay header.b=JchFH5g2; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=student.tugraz.at (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: F1F3124E3B X-Spam-Score: -1.30 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: yOkg/UzOZ7dK Am Freitag, den 09.07.2021, 13:27 +0200 schrieb Leo Prikler: > Am Freitag, den 09.07.2021, 18:36 +0800 schrieb Zhu Zihao: > > Giovanni Biscuolo writes: > > > > > Also, if you think it's useful in the future we could also add a > > > "emacs-telega-server-unstable" for testing bleading edge TDLib > > > features. > > > > > > WDYT? > > > > > > I'll give your patch series a try if I find some time this week. > > > > > > Thanks! Gio' > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > https://github.com/zevlg/telega.el/issues/297#issuecomment-868992025 > > > > I'm OK with it, maybe rename it to `emacs-telega-server-next`? > > > > But I'm not sure Guix maintainer would accept it or not. > This probably depends on how often we'd have to bump TDLib to make > this > meaningful. "Major" release sounds like a 1.0 → 2.0 version bump, > which if "unstable" telega only depended on stuff introduced e.g. in > 1.1 → 1.2 sounds a little too strict. However, if unstable telega > means tailing arbitrary TDLib commits, I'd rather avoid doing that. > > There's so far no precedent to worry about such things, though, so > I'd > rather push the existing patch after some testing or an altered one > if > problems are detected. I haven't gotten to testing things myself > either, but given that we are one stable telega release behind, now > sounds like a good time to start doing that. (Please pardon the > laziness on my part – I typically do lexical work before practical > one > to allow myself to work on other patches and projects as well.) > > Regards, > Leo After some testing, I've decided to push the current patch set, albeit with some changes. I redid my old hardcoding of ffmpeg and rephrased the commit messages to be more explicit. I also followed up with a bump to 0.7.025. There might still be some discussion to be had about versioning, but for now I will close this bug. Regards, Leo