From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33412) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iwlO7-0000AF-Bv for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 06:20:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iwlO6-0001zJ-AR for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 06:20:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55540) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iwlO6-0001yi-6U for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 06:20:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iwlO6-0002eo-1h for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 06:20:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#39332] [PATCH] system: Add btrfs-progs to %BASE-PACKAGES. Resent-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 11:19:18 +0000 From: Brice Waegeneire In-Reply-To: <20200128231445.GA17331@jasmine.lan> References: <1ca6544af3d10a72d2c6a6c7d7a12b67d887e104.1580250411.git.leo@famulari.name> <47a29486-a557-b7f5-645b-382b39eee571@web.de> <20200128231445.GA17331@jasmine.lan> Message-ID: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Leo Famulari Cc: 39332@debbugs.gnu.org, Jonathan Brielmaier , Guix-patches On 2020-01-28 23:14, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 11:42:16PM +0100, Jonathan Brielmaier wrote: >> This adds btrfs-progs, zstd and lzo to the closure with a total of >> 7.7MiB. So that doesn't seem to big. I'm just wondering if we need >> btrfs >> support here at all, as I would call btrfs still kind of exotic apart >> from *SUSE distros and Facebook's backend. > > Yeah, maybe it is too niche. I use it on all my machines but that's > just > me. Let's wait to see if there are more comments before deciding. Maybe %base-packages is the wrong place to add it. But it should at least be added to the system profile if a file-systems entry uses btrfs which isn't the case as I recall.