From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50077) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jEew3-0003QD-Gt for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 16:05:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jEew2-0003QT-Jo for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 16:05:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35488) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jEew2-0003OZ-Fd for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 16:05:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jEew2-0005aZ-9Z for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 16:05:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#26645] Potluck still relivant References: <87y3upttm7.fsf@pobox.com> In-Reply-To: <87y3upttm7.fsf@pobox.com> Resent-Message-ID: Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 16:03:55 -0400 (EDT) From: Jack Hill Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: 26645@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Guix, I was looking through some old issue, and wondering if potluck is still relevant now that we have channels. Shall we close this issue? Best, Jack